If you do nothing, you will surely die! Here is the daily reading of SALVATION!

A treasure is hidden in then consume without moderation to get your hands on it!

The decree attempts to put the Negro population of the planet Earth in the park by the Whiteism, despite the irreversible abolition of slavery by Jean Jacques Dessalines

The crime against the Lord Empire of Ayiti and crime against humanity, according to law, because it is committed in the spirit of slavery.

q = an, u = or =, w = r, r = ê, c = in, h = ch, e = é, ¼ = on, ñ

Google translation, see the original if necessary:

Traduction Google, voir l'original si nécessaire :

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/si-vous-ne-faites-rien-mourrez-certainement-voici-la-ysuhe

LinkedIn: HRH Prínce Tiécoura Jean Dessalines D'Orléans;

Blogger: Forum-Impératrice Claire Heureuse Dessalines, la Ville de Dessalines, capitale d’AYITI;

X: @ForumEmpereurje

Pour tout ouvrage, consultez le site d’Akadémie X :

https://www.akademiex.com/product-page/tome-6-l-administration-impériale-rétablie-au-pays-ancestral-ayiti

Administration impérial rétabli

L’esclavagisation est le crime contre Busa ou contre le Nègre et la Négresse.

Lekba

The planet, whose name is the land, on which we live is in large, even very large, difficulty. The name that is suitable for this state of affairs is that of Kokcn HCN Dewqjmq. There is no need to lay the definition, which is, certainly, already known, because a simple look at the above, is enough to illuminate the capacities to calculate in this direction. In the event that this does not happen, the person is necessarily plagued by a significant defect in the skills in question.

The following point is logically the very subject of this disorder frightened. It is impossible to turn around the pot so as not to point the finger. It is the tribunal, the result of a bad reading of oneself, which inevitably influences your idea of ??the rest of the things, which is at the origin of this unparalleled state of horror. However, before getting there, she generated the most bumpy instrument, whiteism, the greatest spirit of evil. The sum of these three things has led to the nature of the properly truly trickered activity and the way of indulging in it. It was impossible not to lead to this dead end. As we repeat, tribute, via whiteism, its logical success and its highest expression, is the irrefutable cause of the Kokcn HCN Dewqjmq that the earth is currently experiencing.

There are many those who cry out for injustice, to resume their favorite vocabulary - an empty term like its opposite because they are both reference to oneself, precisely your position, as semantic content, which is by the very fact necessarily unstable - and which go so far as to qualify those who believe in such things deprived of excellence.

In such a condition, we will not refrain from saying that excellence has only nominal excellence. We will come back to this empty concept later. In order not to see reality as it is, even when you are the subject, you have to be unable to apply yourself and be in a neutral position. In other words we are unfit for objectivity. Excellence is not limited or can be limited to subjectivity. Otherwise nothing is true or false because everything is true and false in the same report, an absurdity undoubtedly. This is certainly the fate of Hegel's thought, a German philosopher, concerning negresses and negroes. We will see that further.

The Kokcn HCN Dewqjmq

The Kokcn HCN DEWQJMQ, according to our observations, is a fork with two teeth. The first is what should be baptized by the name of nature, in the white sense of the word, and the second is the living. Each teeth is divided into two spaces. Whiteism, which is the main subject of disorder, divides in two nature, its concept by adoption, to oppose a new idea called reality, which will be made of a space, so-called nature and another called outside-of-the-nature. He presents his dualistic vision of things here, namely that the outside-of-the-nature is superior to nature and that, therefore, it is made to dominate it. The outside-of-the-nature is what whiteism is identified with. He arrives by nature to remove it afterwards. How that? No one knows! What matters to him is that he is there. We will understand this part better when we talk about its anthropology, its way of being in relation to others. It is the source.

With regard to the concept of living, it is divided into tribunalities and non-communities. In non-communities are plants; Among the animals are counted the beast and the sub-homes or people-and pas-commers us. The "us" relates to tribunalities, which are also called people-commers us, which are undoubtedly the whiteists. In their vocabulary, they call man and their world in "humanity". This term is to be remembered, we will see why further. The tribunalities are above sub-homes and non-communities. In other words there are men and sub-men, starting from "humanities" and "sub-humanities", to resume his vocabulary. This leads to primitives, the sub-homes, which, by the very fact, are part of nature, and the tribunals, which are, by their dominant character. Civilized, by the excellence of their intellectual capacities, are the dominant. Civilized are what they are by perfectibility, the ability to become another, which results from their nature which they define as absence of nature. This means that men can be what they choose to be. This is the source of the Kokcn HCN Dewqjmq. We will see him right away.

Speech and reality

Should we understand that thought is the division of reality. This act is linked to a subject. This one is also called creator because it is its discursive formatting. In other words, thought is the conception of things from the subject, the creator. This order must be understood as a mental product. Before joining yourself, it is necessary to confront it with reality, which is outside the head, in order to ensure its veracity. Whiteists have not needed to go so far, to use active observation. They simply believe it because, as a sensitive representative of gods, they say and the thing appears. But sensitive experience has already given the verdict, its verdict, namely that dualist thought is inadequate with reality, in other words, it is false. The Savqn deity in whiteism necessarily rejects it.

The consequence of the verdict is terrible in the sense that it highlights the emptiness of the whiteist being. Whiteism is a walk in nothingness. It is reduced to that, just that. Hence the evil of being the inhabitant, according to the trivial pathology.

Human pathology consists of destroying, that is, things, others, including the self, in order to bring them to the modeled self, the empty being, in order to give oneself, one hopes, an effective future, which means emerging from the chimerical state. None of the blocks we have seen above are spared. The invented divinity, the god-man, is the "I," the instrument of creation aimed at its objectification.

A material substance

Whiteness turns outward to be what it claims to be. It must create it, create itself by bringing about what it needs. Indeed, it starts from the principle that "is what it states as such." Aristotle makes the activity of thought a source of self, while whiteness makes it the activity of its own creation. Thus, man, the creator, finds himself outside of himself; it goes without saying, he is the creator. Man, or whiteness, is or will be through his creative activity; he has or will have his creation as his substance. The being of man or whiteness is external to man, thus a material substance, since it is through his work that he exists. Let us not forget that he is perfectible through his nature, which is not one. This nature is the excellence of his gifts. It is there, at the level of creation, that everything happens. This point is extremely important for fully and truly understanding the world in which we live, and necessarily everything that follows.

The disruption of the ofowu order through human creation to be

Man, particularly whiteness, is inhabited by a distinctive creative impulse, the cause of which is his desire to create a world in his image, as he did for gods, his gods, the gods of man—as Jean Jacques Dessalines often says—in which he will invent himself. Indeed, the little information he acquires from time to time about certain elements of what he calls nature, information that is very fragmentary and often, too often, uncertain, he allows himself, all excited and haughty, to apply it carelessly to nature in the context of his project of creation. Obviously, with such a state of mind, he does not imagine the possibility of risks - let us not forget that God says and the thing appears. It is deeply ingrained in himself that he is endowed with a power to overcome his malaise. He has, as was to be expected, ended up dragging nature to the brink of chaos. An example of this is the exploitation of mineral resources. This is the case of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and gas, which produce 80% of global greenhouse gas emissions, which gas plays a major role in climate change. They disrupt the ofowu phenomenon of the greenhouse effect, which, through the naturally occurring gas, balances the heat system essential to our planet. Without these gases, the temperature of our planet would be -18°C, which would make life on Earth impossible, instead of +14°C, which gives us a good climate. Even without analyzing the natural process of balancing through greenhouse gases, we believe this is understandable so far.

Through their activities, which are linked to their creation project, the whiteists massively release large quantities of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which unfortunately keeps them trapped because it is beyond the capacity of the natural regulatory system. This results in the disruption of the natural greenhouse effect system. This consequence inevitably leads to another: climate change. Indeed, the temperature increases, due to the presence of these gigantic quantities of heat. Incidentally, for a being whose essence, according to his own vocabulary, is the excellence of gifts, this is shameful.

A temperature of -18°C thwarts life; a temperature of +14°C, currently +15°C—the temperature is rising by +1°C—will fry it. It is Our God, the Good Lord, versus the false, the god of men, more precisely of whiteism, which is incapable of creation, which is the predicate of Divinity. Hence the term "Good God," meaning The True One, attached to Our God, GwqmrtLa. Jean Jacques Dessalines, Power of Our Ancestors, through the voice of Bukmqn, revealed this truth to the world. One need only deviate from the Ofowu Order for disaster to ensue.

There are perhaps no human activities, especially economic ones, that are outside the scope of global warming. Everything is connected, in one way or another, to greenhouse gases. It follows that the idea of ??exploiting nature in order to dominate it is inextricably linked to the idea of ??disaster. The essence of man, in this case, whiteness, fails him. The false gods don't even know how to read things. The Ofowu Order exists, and it must be respected. Otherwise, everything collapses. On this level, the living and the non-living are affected indifferently.

Even with all this, the position of the whiteists, which consists of dominating nature, that is, becoming its master and possessor through the "knowledge" that one acquires, does not change one iota. The whiteists stand firmly on their position. There are, it must be emphasized, scientists from the world of whites, where whiteism reigns, who quickly identified the danger and who immediately formulated proposals to remedy the situation. It is therefore necessary to follow the proposed solutions very closely to evaluate them. We may be going around in circles because if we insist on maintaining the crazy idea of ??dominating nature, the problem will surely worsen. It will turn into a nightmare. With global warming of +1 °C, the consequences are disastrous!

The Word

Let's see what's happening at the level of the order of We. This order is necessarily contested because it originates from Our God, in other words, because it is ofowu. Must it also be dominated, and therefore recreated? Everything that exists, according to white ideology, is matter on which man must exercise his creative gifts, that is, his intellectual capacities, in order to create himself. This clearly suggests that there is another plan in the white approach to the order of We. Whiteism has the firm will to dismantle this order as well, to create it, at best, according to white ideology, to recreate it. It's frankly frenzied at this point. Yes, the plan is domination, in the sense of their possession, of people-not-like-us. The possession of others is a way of being in the world that whiteists call "slavery." Whiteism justifies its action by granting it objectivity, namely, naturalness. It is therefore not the one who decides to act. It presents itself as the instrument of nature, which signifies a normal control. What are the mechanisms of re-creation?

Without going into detail, because the space allocated to this production is extremely limited, the order of the We—which is also called the lakort, that is, a massive block, at its base, namely the w¼n, and, on another level, plural, here the Badr, according to the ancestral theory of the being that we are and presented by His Majesty Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines D’Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste—is, for re-creation, segmented to result in people distinct from others, in a hierarchical order. This is of great importance because the whiteists use it to distance themselves from others and acquire the right to govern them, through its anthropology. It is, in fact, the hierarchization, discursive, certainly, of the lakort, to the obvious advantage of whiteism since it will situate itself at the highest level. Re-creation is underway, following the same model of the re-creation of nature.

Here, roughly, is how the whiteists imagine it! We are moving from a massive order to a multi-order, which gives the following. Let's take a little trip to antiquity, we will ask Aristotle, the Stagirite, to give us a very brief idea of ??the reality concerning the lakort. It is broken at the level of thought. The philosopher says very clearly: "Man is a political animal" (Pol., Book I, Chapter II, 9); he thus evokes an organization: "It is necessary," he continues, "that beings that cannot exist without each other unite"; the necessity of organization is based on the order of what is for him nature; "it is by nature," he says, "that in most cases there is a commander and a commanded" (Ibid. chap. XIII, 5). The justification for this is the variation in the quality of the soul. It is not the same in all. For example, "the slave, according to the philosopher, is totally devoid of the faculty of deliberation, the woman possesses it but without authority, the child possesses it but imperfectly." (Ibid). The free man possesses all the parts of the soul. This is why command naturally falls to him. Aristotle thus establishes a dichotomy between men based on their essence, which is intelligence. When Aristotle speaks of man as a political animal, he is referring to this inequality, the essence of politics. Politics consists of uniting men into a single whole, and is therefore in itself inequality. This means that politics is the means of achieving a factual hierarchy between people. This also means that politics is one of the elements of anthropology. This is the place of inequality; Aristotle states that politics and slavery go hand in hand and politics is the means to achieve slavery, that is, completed anthropology,” taken from our work: TIÉCOURA DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS, LE PRINCE DE L’EMPIRE DESSALINIEN DÉPLOYÉ, VOLUME IV, LES ÉDITIONS LOF, 2010, pp. 50. “a completed family,” says the philosopher, “is composed of slaves and free people” (Pol. I, chap. III, 5). Here, in the thought of the Stagirite, it is a question, first of all, of the Greeks. To put it another way, this dichotomy applies first and foremost toothe Greeks. Is anthropology limited to the Greeks? No. The earth is populated by a multitude of people. Are they concerned by anthropology? Of course it is. The Stagirite speaks of man and this is not than in Greece. It is man who is thus subdivided. Outside of Greece there are barbarians, they are all slaves. Consequently they are made to be subjected to man. Barbarians are made to be dominated because of their lack of intelligence. (Pol; I, 5). Whiteism is not yet conceived at this stage. There are two important points to remember: 1-, intelligence is the yardstick of man, of sub-man and non-man; 2-, it is the source of inequality which is slavery, of which politics is the mode of realization. Slavery is a creation, for two reasons: 1. Politics is an ordered state, governed by rules or laws; 2. It cannot do without conquest. To speak of conquest is to highlight coercion, which is violence. Aristotle's political philosophy disrupts the Ofowu Order on earth.

Is dewqjmq a Greek affair? Certainly not. Indeed, the Israelites are not far removed from the way the Greeks conceptualize lakort. The role of essence is attributed to their invented divinity, the god of man, asserts Jean Jacques Dessalies. The conclusion is the same: the others, here, are the pagans, therefore the slaves, versus the people of the gods, that is, the Israelites, the chosen people of the gods, then masters and possessors of all things, always according to the image and position of their gods. Marriage in Europe

Two ideologies, one philosophical, the other religious, are sweeping across Europe. By mixing the two, we obtain the following: an anthropology in which Black men and women are the number one enemy, that is, the lowest beings. Let's start with the French philosopher Voltaire (1694-1778), a major investor in the Black man's trade. Voltaire speaks of Black men and women as if he were a specialist in the field. This is the effect of philosophy and religion. Let's highlight a few traits of his thought! Let's not evaluate it, let's simply become acquainted with it!

"Their round eyes, their flat noses, their always large lips, their differently shaped ears, the wool on their heads, the very measure of their intelligence, place prodigious differences between them and other species of men." And what demonstrates that they do not owe this difference to their climate is that Negroes and Negresses transported to the coldest countries always produce animals of their own species, and that mulattoes are only a bastard race of a black man and a white woman, or of a white man and a black woman."

"Nature has subordinated to this principle these different degrees and these characters of nations, which we so rarely see changing. It is by this that Negroes are the slaves of other men. "...we went to buy these Negroes on the Guinea Coast, the Gold Coast and the Ivory Coast; I do not know the price today, but thirty years ago you could have a fine Negro for fifty pounds; "It's about five times less than a fat ox." Voltaire, (Essay on the Morals and Spirit of Nations, 1770)

"White people are superior to these Negroes, as Negroes are to monkeys, and as monkeys are to oysters." Voltaire (in "Treatise on Metaphysics...)

Voltaire's space is full of everything; he doesn't know how to organize his thoughts well. Despite everything, we understand that he places "Negroes" below others. The reasons are both physical and intellectual. The same is true of the English economist David Hume: "I suspect Negroes, and other human species in general, of being naturally inferior to the white race." There has never been a civilized nation of any color other than white, nor an individual illustrious by his actions or by his capacity for reflection... They have neither manufactured machines, nor art, nor science. Without mentioning our colonies, there are Negro slaves scattered throughout Europe, the slightest sign of intelligence has never been discovered among them. " But the points are recurrent, something is therefore emerging. With Georges Cuvier (zoologist, Research on fossil bones), we remain in the accident: "The Negro race is confined to the south of the Atlas, its complexion is black, its hair frizzy, its skull compressed and its nose crushed; Its protruding snout and large lips clearly bring it closer to apes: the peoples that compose it have always remained barbaric (…) the most degraded of human races, whose forms come closest to those of the brute, and whose intelligence has nowhere risen to the point of achieving regular government." Knowledge, although it is a matter of the senses in the majority of cases, seeks to say something.

What distinguishes the white man from the Negro, from the Negress, is intelligence. The German philosopher, Immanuel Kant: "The Negroes of Africa," he says, "have received from nature no sentiment that rises above stupidity. (…) one could not find a single one of them who, whether in art or science, or in any other famous discipline, has produced anything great." "Among the whites, on the contrary, it is constant that someone rises from the lowest populace and acquires a certain consideration in the world, thanks to the excellence of his superior gifts. So essential is the difference between these two human races! and it seems as great in the faculties of the mind as according to the skin color" (Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and the sublime, GF Flammarion, Paris, 1990, pp. 166, 167). "The free man possessing all the parts of the soul," according to Aristotle, and "The excellence of the superior gifts of the white man" are identical. This is why we read in Hegel, the German, the following: "The Africans, on the other hand, have not yet reached this recognition of the universal. Their nature is withdrawal into themselves. What we call religion, state, reality existing in and for itself, absolutely valid, all this does not yet exist for them. The abundant accounts of missionaries put this fact beyond doubt (…)

What characterizes the Negroes is precisely that their consciousness has not reached the contemplation of a solid objectivity, such as God, the law, to which the will of man can adhere, and through which he can arrive at the intuition of his own essence" and continues by saying that Africa is "an undeveloped, ahistorical world, entirely imprisoned by the natural spirit and whose place is still on the threshold of the history of the universal."

These are all the ingredients that we see among the Greeks. Anyone who leads himself to believe that there is an anthropological dualism comparable to that of the Greeks, that is, desire versus intelligence, is mistaken. It is discussed, however, it is not at the forefront. European anthropology has another preoccupation. It is present among other peoples, but here, through the priority given to creation, it occupies a higher position. A specifically European anthropology

with Greek and Israelite ingredients

Apparently, Europe follows the Greeks in terms of dualism. However, it fails to grant superiority to intelligence, as Aristotle did. European anthropology is not a "self" in itself, which is a dualism following the Greek model: soul-body, Plato, and mind-soul, Aristotle, but a "self" in union with the other. It is with the other, but it seeks to distinguish itself from it by a part of itself, which is also sensitive. What Europe calls speculation is that which can guarantee it the submission of an indomitable adversary, that is, a bond that cannot be breached. On this desire, slavery will be built, of which politics is the means, which will be the realized anthropology or the culmination of its anthropology. It is unable to theorize it, that is, it is blocked or imitated, and therefore it remains stuck expressing this domination sentimentally. This is what we are witnessing. The object of European reflection is material, and its realization is just as much so, that is, having a material self, which is external.

Thus, there is a new element, a new self-awareness, although it has a limited connection with Greece. Europe is bringing the sensible into the self, the essence, but with a specificity. Let's see! We are entering the specificity of the European self-conception. This new element is complexion, something unknown to the Greeks. From now on, people will be classified by their complexion. There is more. The semantic content of complexion goes beyond skin color, "a soul in a completely black body," says Charles de Montesquieu? No, he replies! It sounds banal. No, it isn't. The statement is rather abysmal because a place is made here for intelligence. The French philosopher highlights the unity of the sensible and the insensible. The sensible must walk with the insensible to arrive at the desired distinction, white and the others. Moreover, they form an inseparable whole. The complexion is, first of all, superficial and simple; it is linked on this point to the sensible. It goes without saying that the other aspect of meaning is profound; it can only be grasped through the sensible. This finds its reason for being, according to Europeans, in insensitivity. There, it encounters the parts of the soul and the excellence of higher gifts to form a single thing with them. It manifests them even if we don't see how. Here is the stumbling block, and sentimentality flies to its aid because it doesn't need to be proven. What we observe is that complexion, which is an accident, has, in this sphere, the status of substance since it denotes the excellence of gifts. Should we conclude that the surface meaning is transparent in the sense that it reveals the secondary meaning, the essence, which is profound? This is the hard part of the new anthropology.

Complexion is both sensitive and insensitive. It reveals the sensitive and insensitive parts, thus the full value of being. Kant, the German, could not be clearer on this: "Humanity reaches its greatest perfection in the race of whites. The yellow Indians already have less talent. The Negroes are situated much lower." Voltaire goes even further: "Whites are superior to these Negroes, as the Negroes are to monkeys, and as monkeys are to oysters." Why this distinction between the two groups of beings? The philosopher answers the question:

"The race of Negroes is a species of men different from ours [...] one can say that if their intelligence is not of a different species than our understanding, it is very inferior. They are not capable of great attention, they plan little, and do not seem made either for the advantages or for the abuses of our philosophy. They are native to this part of Africa like elephants and monkeys; they believe themselves born in Guinea to be sold to the Whites and to serve them." Voltaire, (Essay on the Morals and Spirit of Nations, 1770). We understand even better the anthropological character of the following statements: "This man was completely black from head to toe," says Kant, "which clearly proves that these words were stupid," the transparency of skin color for the institution of slavery through politics:

"Nature has subordinated to this principle these different degrees and these characters of nations, which we so rarely see changing. It is by this that the Negroes are the slaves of other men. "...we went to buy these Negroes on the Guinea Coast, the Gold Coast, and the Ivory Coast; I don't know the price today, but thirty years ago you could have a fine Negro for fifty pounds; "It's about five times less than a fat ox" Voltaire, (Essay on the Morals and Spirit of Nations, 1770)

The fate of Black men and women is forever fixed by these authors who proclaim themselves to be the source of knowledge, their knowledge, on which civilization rests, a term synonymous with creation.

The emergence of the notion of races

Thus was born the notion of races. Each author gives it their own color. For some, it is the same species but with a hierarchy based on higher faculties, the hard part. They remain with Aristotle and the Greeks; for others, they are distinct species; for still others, they are distinct animal species. It is not skin color that is the subject of the discussion but essence, which the higher faculties represent. It determines, in one way or another, people by their complexion. To name the color of the skin, because it is striking, is to express the essence, the profound meaning. The color of the skin is the phenomenal materiality, a kind of reference point, of it. The complexion does not produce the essence and the latter is not the cause of the complexion. It is a phenomenon of nature: "The Negroes of Africa," says Immanuel Kant, "have received from nature no sentiment that rises above silliness." This is why one must be skillful in the use of the word relating to races, to know whether it is of the complexion-complexion or of the substance, which makes the being in question.

The Hierarchy of the Lakort People

Kant's anthropology contains another element of consequence: the hierarchy of the lakort, which is based primarily on substance and secondarily on complexion, due to its ostentatiousness. This is why the author states: "Among whites, on the contrary, it is common for someone to rise from the lowest rabble and acquire a certain consideration in the world, thanks to the excellence of their superior gifts. So essential is the difference between these two human races! And it seems as great in terms of mental faculties as in skin color" (Observations on the Sentiment of the Beautiful and the Sublime, GF Flammarion, Paris, 1990, pp. 166, 167). From these words we must draw the idea of ??perfectibility of the Genevan philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, that is, the capacity to change as the nature of man. Through complexion, the quality of substance is projected, that of human and subhuman. It is within this framework that we should speak of species and different species, of inferiority and superiority.

We should not see the German philosopher as a special case, one who cultivates a negative sentiment towards Black women and men. There are legions of people with fair complexions, in the second sense of the term, who fall into this category. We have the example of Charles de Montesquieu who maintains: "It is the complexion that makes the man." Here, it is not complexion in the primary sense, skin color, because Montesquieu knows very well that complexion, in the sense of skin color, is an accident and that accidents do not enter into the composition of the essence of things. Man is by his essence, not by his complexion, simple. This is why he continues in these terms: "God cannot put a soul in a completely black body", here it is a question of the quintessence of man. Otherwise the rule of representation, between essence and appellation, would be transgressed, "a soul in a completely black body". "It is impossible," he continues, "that we suppose that these people are men". Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws. Black men and women are deprived of the essence of man. Voltaire is just as categorical as the others: "Their round eyes, their flat noses, their always large lips, their differently shaped ears, the wool of their heads, the very measure of their intelligence, place between them and other species of men prodigious differences. And what demonstrates that they do not owe this difference to their climate is that Negroes and Negresses transported to the coldest countries always produce animals of their species there, and that mulattoes are only a bastard race of a black man and a white woman, or of a white man and a black woman", complete works of Voltaire, by Voltaire and Charvin, page 9. And Voltaire continues, elsewhere, "Whites are superior to these Negroes, as Negroes are to monkeys, and as monkeys are to oysters. » Voltaire (in Treatise on Metaphysics...Warning! We haven't said everything. Indeed, a certain Ferry once said: "The Negro is not a race, but a nightmare," Documentary series: History Files. We Wnderstand Commissioner Félicité Léger Santhonax much better when he states: "From the nothingness where you were, you have passed into existence." Warning! He doesn't say: You have become like us or people-like-us. We must understand that before, Black men and women were nothing, pure matter. Now, like them, they have a form. Yet, the Black man and the Black woman remain a negligible quantity because, even if they are integrated into the scale of beings, they are subhuman.

What must be learned from all this is that whiteness, as a deep complexion, therefore the essence, is in union with other species. It is made to be their soul, but from the outside. because the soul cannot be in a non-white body, here the color. The mind, according to Aristotle, governs, and the soul, according to Plato, commands. This is the role of intelligence, according to white, the substance. The white man therefore cannot not always be conquering others or gathering them around him to command. Nature gives him as their intelligence. We must also deduce that a part of the white man's self is outside of him since he cannot be without these beings from outside. For him, to make himself is to bring about this gathering around him that we call enslavement.

The Hierarchy of the Lakort People

The complexion tells us who is the master and who is the slave. This is the lesson of everything we have just seen!

A simple glance

We are talking about re-creation by man, that is, whiteness, false gods, in fact the one who created man in his own image to then appropriate him, in order to objectify himself: Men are not what they say. They know this well. Let's take the case of Aristotle! "The philosopher has so much difficulty theorizing slavery based on the quality of human essence that he admits that on this point nature presents some difficulties: because "some have the bodies of free men, such have the souls of free men" (Pol. I, chap., V, 1254b). The problem, once posed, is quickly dismissed, and the author returns to his (false) certainties: "That therefore by nature some are free and others slaves, it is manifest..." The matter is quite different; it is not manifest at all. If there are men who are free by nature and men who are slaves by nature, how can we explain that the latter can conquer the free in order to command them? How can nature produce free people and slaves without endowing them with an inclination to follow their nature, to the point that we are forced to rely on brute force, war, to determine it? It is clear that the free, like the slave, is extrinsic, in the discursive sense. Taken from TIÉCOURA DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS, LE PRINCE DE L’EMPIRE DESSALINIEN DÉPLOYÉ, VOLUME IV, LES ÉDITIONS LOF, 2010, pp. 70.

The context of all these discourses

One might think, by referring to reality, the current treatment consistent with what is said, that the self-conceptions we have just presented are unanimous. No, this is not the case. We are not going to make an exhaustive study of it. This is not the place for such a thing. We are content to say this. Faced with this assault on the order of the We, the lakort, let us listen to M.C.F. Volney who wrote on the eve of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen: "What a subject for meditation [...] to think that this race of black men, today our slave and the object of our contempt, is the very one to whom we owe our arts, our sciences and even the use of speech, to imagine, finally, that it is among the peoples who claim to be the most friendly to liberty, to humanity, that the most barbaric of slavery has been sanctioned and questioned whether black men have an intelligence of the kind of that of white men!" (M. C. F. Volney, Voyage en Syrie et en Egypte, Paris, 1787, t. I, p.74-77). According to this text, there is no doubt that what the authors, ranked among the greatest, say is in no way in line with reality. Volney clearly does not have the same preoccupation as these authors. They are whiteists; they have a justification for their being and, therefore, for their project of re-creation, for which enslavement is a necessity. They tell falsehoods due to their inability to objectify reality, and therefore to create a work of knowledge. The obstacle is the human substance that drives them. This is imbued with the divinity of man. They are then convinced that what they say can bring about the appearance of the thing. Where there is resistance, they believe that, by dint of saying it, like a kind of incantation, they will end up diverting thought from oneself, the ofowu Self, from oneself and that they will win the game. They attempt a reprogramming of the object, which is understood as re-creation, which implies enslavement.

Re-creation for Slavery

We are in a process of enslaving. On this point, the thing is extremely interesting. Let's see! We have just seen that the objective pursued by man, the whiteists, is something foreign to the world: domination, called by them slavery, whose correct or appropriate term is enslavement. Why enslavement? Because they cannot make them slaves, the necessary element, and, consequently, they can only treat them as such through a way of doing things. There is an unbridgeable opposition between what they want and do, between what others are and what they do in relation to what they are. The whiteists have no power over this. Hence the term "enslaved," which is fiercely opposed to the word "enslaved," which would be a practical truth. In the current situation, the word slave is pure nothingness. This is impossible. It is downright nonsense. There are barriers that cannot be crossed. Those of the Munal Being are an example. We are what we are. That is irreversible. No thought can add or subtract anything, whatever the situation. In this implacable logic, the Great Scholar in this matter, Jean Jacques Dessalines, the son raised by Agbawaya Toya, declares: "We are not slaves but condemned to work in the fields." This is a correction, straightforward, made by Jean Jacques Dessalines. The restrictive and unconditionally rejected discourse and context do not and cannot make being. Within any contrary and contradictory context, we are and remain indomitable and unsubmissive. Therefore, the appearance is on the surface, an extremely thin layer. It follows that there are no slaves and never will be. Logically, the object of the discourse is neither the slave nor slavery, because they are empty terms, but enslavement, the actual acts. We are here within the logic of discourse. However, in reality, the matter is quite different. We retain the vocabulary of whiteness to arrive at its condemnation.

Conquest

Since there are no slaves—we are within the human logic here—they resort to conquest—here a fact—which means war against a Great People of planet Earth for what it is. Whoever speaks of war speaks of appalling upheavals in the order of things. On this level, we are similar to the climate disaster perpetrated by the same group of people and for the same reasons. This disaster is completely normal because it contradicts the Ofowu, Divine Act, that is, Our God, Good Lord, GwqmrtLa. It is total destabilization. From Aristotle to Nicolas Machiavelli and up to the present day, whiteness teaches that "Conquest is the most natural thing in the world." This thought is necessary and indispensable to whiteness. The latter cannot renounce it because it is indestructible in the human context. Whiteness doesn't just teach it; it resorts to it whenever it seems necessary. So, nothing needs to change.

Kidnapping, sequestration, and dispossession, terms to which conquest is reduced, do not occur without physical and psychological violence, to use terminology from elsewhere, for example, politics and religion. "Politics and slavery, enslavement, are two interchangeable terms" because the former is the embodiment of the latter, according to the Stagirite, see our book on this: Politics is an external constraint, while the constraint of religion is internal. Both have an internal impact since one must sometimes endure it and accommodate oneself to it.

The conquest deemed most natural is physical control over someone other than oneself, certainly people-not-like-us, necessarily against their will, to dictate their thoughts, their feelings, in short, their conduct in all that is decisive in life. Whether the impact is physical or mental, it is an obstacle to the other. Conquest then aims to pile others into one's court and necessarily under one's domination, a subordinating structure. This is why it is necessary for enslavement, "slavery."

Religion in the Most Natural Conquest in the World

Let us see the work of religion against the Ofowu Order! The thought of the slave and its practice called enslavement did not originate with Greek society; they stem from humankind. With the Greeks, they reached a high point, theoretical, of course. It is with the Christian religion that they reach a high point, a considerable elaboration. With whiteness, they reach their peak. What must be remembered is that whiteness is its derivative.

What we have seen above, concerning Black people, philosophical and literary considerations, then a creation of men, is based on the following: the concepts of gods, who are obviously not Our God, therefore, Good God, all rely on enslavement. All the groups that derive from it practice enslavement. Many have very grand aims and they inevitably resort to conquest. This is the case of the Israelites with their concept of false gods. The project of David's kingdom is an example of this.

These forms of slavery, by definition, have no respect for people. People are not within them. They are there as means. In the Bible, which is the voice of such a grouping, there is a myth in which it is reported that a son of Noah, whose name is Ham, was cursed, namely that his generations would be slaves to his brothers, because he contemplated the nakedness of his drunken father, Noah, a drunkard. This comes from the Bible, so it must be a joke. We cannot, therefore, give it any credence on this point. The slaveholders, supporters of the gods of this religion, maintain that Black men and women are descendants of Ham. This is not just saying it for the sake of saying it. This must be read as a justification for the enslavement of Black people. Enslavement through ideologies, enslavement through religion.

However, there is a nuance hidden in practice by the justification for the enslavement of Black people. Indeed, the tale says "the slaves of your brothers' slaves." Out of stupidity, these white people attribute to themselves the status of slave without realizing it. We don't talk about it. Perhaps they've adjusted it since then, to save themselves from ridicule. Well, none of that concerns us; they'll manage. But it had to be highlighted. What's important for us is the source of the stupidity, namely the Bible, because it allows us to understand many things, at the level of reality. To the Ephesians, something like this: the Apostle Paul, in a letter, writes: "Slaves, obey your master." The "master" is the one who dictates your conduct and, therefore, possesses you. There is nothing surprising in this; Jesus came to save from the "slavery" of sin, not from the "slavery" of men. It is even to consolidate the latter with the former. The statement of the apostle Paul highlights this. Interestingly, there is a concordance at the level of the testaments; both the old and the new are an apologetic of "slavery." This is where the anthropology of the French philosopher, Charles de Montesquieu, takes on its full meaning, namely that "such a good god cannot put a soul in a completely black body." "Black" is everything that is said about it above, and even less in the thought of the French philosopher because it has no soul at all, the seat of intellectual capacities, according to philosophical anthropologists. The important thing to remember here is that, just like Montesquieu, the god of the Bible is a slaveholder, and vice versa.

Slavery and its author, religion

What we have just seen is a thing of the past, some might say. Certainly not. Just as it reached the Apostle Paul, it did not die with him. Only more than 500 years ago, even this morning, this discourse still guides the thoughts of men, the slaveholders. Let us read what follows and we will understand. We have all heard of "slavery", the vast majority of us do not yet know that Greece did not order it" but Christianity, through the Church, which, in the name of the gods of the Bible, as we have just seen, is at the origin of this acme of horror, see the Decree of Tuesday, June 4, 2024, titled: "Pure truth: instituted for revenge" or the work "The Imperial Administration Reestablished", first quarter 2019, Les Éditions LOF, to learn, like greenhouse gases, of the peak of cruelty resulting from "conquest is the most natural thing in the world" carried out on the ancestral continent by Christians.

How did it all begin? Briefly, still along the same lines, in 1493, Pope Alexander VI, born Roderic Llançol i de Borja (1431-1503)—regarding religion, for those of you with stubbornness, as we say here—divided up the world and gave its lot to each group of men who were under his control. Our continent (Jelefwe or Gelefwe) went to the Portuguese.

Tommaso Parentucceli (1398-1455) became Pope and took the name Nicholas V. On January 8, 1454, Pope Nicholas V ordered Alfonso V, sovereign of Portugal, to enslave the Black men and women of the Ancestral Continent. The establishment of slavery means officially or effectively instituting the domination of man, the term by which Europeans define themselves, over subhumans, the so-called slaves. The papal bull, a law, of Nicholas V ordering the enslavement of Black men and women is based on the biblical myth outlined above. The invasion with the aim of "slavery" is led by the Church. The Church necessarily reigns in all colonies; it is involved in everything.

We will not return here to the height of horror that the "slave conquests" brought about. Once again, refer to the Decree of Tuesday, June 4, 2024, entitled: "Pure Truth: Instituted for Revenge" or to the book "The Imperial Administration Reestablished," first quarter 2019, LOF Editions.

The response of Black people to the discourse as well as to unspeakable horrors

This will further the destabilization similar to greenhouse gases and other forms of pollution. Indeed, the discourse of the "natural slave" has not caught on. Knowing that they are not slaves, Black people organize the Resistance commonly called the Municipal Resistance. Their desire to be in themselves, by themselves, and for themselves immediately pushes them to react against "conquest, the most natural thing in the world." In 1685, Cussy maintains the following: "We have in the Negroes formidable domestic enemies." In 1791-92 during the great confrontation, Governor Blanchelande stated: "The insurgent forces were formed exclusively of Blacks, and not of mulattoes or other free people of color" (...) only the slaves were openly revolted, and killed their employers and set fire to their homes." "Blanchelande to the Governor of Santo Domingo (S.d.)", AGI, Santo Domingo, 1029, f. 1. Let us put a name and a face to this counter-strike, Jean Jacques Dessalines: "That my name," he said, "has become a horror to all the peoples who want slavery, and that despots and tyrants only pronounce it while cursing the day that saw me born"; "I have raised the standard of the Resistance," he continued, "because it is time to teach the French that they are monsters that this earth devours." too slowly for the happiness of the Negroes and Negresses"; what must be understood in the statement is that, first of all, slavery is against-ofowu, since the "earth devours it", an act in progress on a gordrm element, that is foreign to La, "too slowly", and that, then, "we, Negresses and Negroes, we take charge of its destruction". We behave as an instrument of katrl of La, that is holistic balance. There is a logical continuation in the thought of Jean Jacques Dessalines. Indeed our Ancestors reject and fight everything that is against-ofowu, contrary to the Divine Order, in particular the domination of some by others, in short slavery: "The people inhabiting the Island formerly called Saint-Domingue, agree here to form a Free State, Sovereign and Independent of any other power in the universe, under the name of Empire of Haiti"; Jean Jacques Dessalines here highlights the Munal Self as Thing of the La, called the universe by many, and states its state of Being in Itself, by Itself and for Itself as well as its consequences: "Slavery (slavery) is forever abolished." It follows that "Never will any white person, whatever his nation, set foot on this Territory as master or owner. This resolution will henceforth be the fundamental basis of our constitution." It is indeed Us and it is also the Country of our Ancestors, the Country, called the Empire of AYITI, the One and Only, that we have erected against slavery, then specifically against whiteness, under the effect of the "Divine Decrees", which are "Immortal", according to the Constitution as well as many declarations. Hence the Intransferability and Eternity of the Empire of AYITI. Thus our Gwqmunity is clearly and irreversibly affirmed. It will happen as he declares because "We have dared to be free," he continues, "let us dare to be free by ourselves and for ourselves." Our Gwqmunal Space is hermetically sealed, there is no way out. We are facing the most powerful proposition expressing the Munal Being, in a precisely, slavery, which does not mean that "the most powerful proposition" is limited to it. It is in itself infinite. To continue, Jean Jacques Dessalines states, without hesitation: "Yes, we have returned, to these real cannibals, war for war, crimes for crimes, outrages for outrages." This is yet another demonstration of the immensity of what we are, We, Black women and Black men. The counter-violence of these words highlights Self-Affirmation, the art of self-defense, the Ofowu Self, with exceptional and exemplary rage and assurance for the Good of lakort and ultimately for La. Based on everything we have seen so far, we maintain, without hesitation, that our internal constitution obliges us to do so and that it is not a matter of time: "Generals, Jean Jacques Dessalines is categorical on this, and you, leaders, gathered here near me for the happiness of our country, the day has arrived, this day which must eternalize our Glory, our Independence. If there could exist among you a lukewarm heart, let it move away and tremble to pronounce the oath which must unite us. Let us swear to the entire universe, to posterity, to ourselves, to renounce France forever, and to die rather than live under its domination. To fight until your last breath for the independence of our country! So swear into his hands the oath to live free and independent, and to prefer death to anything that would put you back under the yoke. Finally, swear to forever pursue the traitors and enemies of your independence." January 1, 1804. And all this is not without this statement: "No one is worthy of being Haitian unless he is a good father, a good son, a good husband, and above all a good soldier." The Constitution, to Dessalines, May 20, 1805. This is the eternal response, Our Response, to the slavers! They cannot be on the same territory as us. This point is Dessalinesian.

The endless return of the whiteists

The whiteists are unidirectional beings; they do not know how to change. They always maintain their direction, and in everything. Jean Jacques Dessalines took care to highlight their unidirectionality: "If they find refuge among us, they will still be the machinators of our troubles and divisions." One must be gifted with the capacity for observation and calculation to be able to live. Jean Jacques Dessalines thus gave us the example. The Blancistes are made this way because they are reduced to their inadequate nature of thought. They are their entire being, which is reduced to the will to make themselves, that is to say, to create themselves. One would say that they are monocellular. This leads Louis Delgrès, from Martinique, Madinina, to say: "There are men unfortunately too powerful by their distance from the authority from which they emanate, who do not want to see black men, or those originating from this color, except in the shackles of Slavery." Delgrès also brings to our capacity to know their unidirectional nature. If that is all they are, their nature of being will never allow them to renounce domination, and therefore slavery.

Let us learn about their way of being and acting in this matter! Following the Independence of Guadeloupe, Vice-Admiral Denis, Duke Décrès (1761-1820), Minister of the Navy in 1801, replied on November 14, 1801, in the midst of the abolition of “slavery”: “I want slaves in the colonies. Freedom is a food for which the stomachs of Negroes are not prepared. I believe that we must seize every opportunity to give them back their natural food except for the seasonings that justice and humanity demand. I believe that we must send a considerable force to Guadeloupe, not to reduce it to what it was but to what it must be.” Before that, “Guadeloupe and Guyana liberated themselves and abolished slavery in June 1794. In 1795, Saint Lucia, Grenada and Saint Vincent succeeded in abolition, but were recaptured by British forces and returned to slavery in 1796” In S. Bianchi: Revolts and Revolution 1773 - 1804. We will not say more so as not to weigh down the discourse and thus harm its understanding. Many people can list a few examples because these facts are legion and also accessible.

The situation in AYITI

Let's talk about AYITI! Dismay swept across France upon learning the news of August 22-23, 1791, on October 27, 1791. The whites of this sad country would not rest in their place. The unidirectional movement would prevail. On December 7, 1791, the Assembly adopted the following decree: "The troops must subdue the Blacks without harming the men of color." Léger Félicité Santhonax was sent to AYITI. Upon arrival, he loudly stated: "Slavery is necessary for the culture and property of the colony, and it is neither in the principles nor in the will of the National Assembly, nor of the king, to infringe on the prerogatives of the colonists in this regard." Toussaint L’Ouverture, in the shadow of his wings, finds a position and he will promise the Directory, the French government, to submit the Negroes to it: “I answer under my personal responsibility for the submission, order and devotion to France of my brothers the Blacks”. In 1801 a text called by the bunda qmr, “constitution of Toussaint”, of which the blancists and the atha grant him paternity; it is said, from the outset: “Saint-Domingue in all its extent, ... is part of the French Empire,. All men are born, live and die free and French there...”. The text clearly states that he is about to keep his promise. Will there be a place for Toussaint L’Ouverture himself? On March 16, 1802, Bonaparte wrote to Leclerc: "As soon as you have gotten rid of Toussaint, Christophe, Dessalines and the main brigands, and the mass of blacks is disarmed, send back to the continent all blacks and men of color who have played a role in the civil unrest." We cannot help but wonder by what means the Blancistes have been able to maintain themselves among us, however small they may be. Jean-Jacques Dessalines reports on this subject: "What! Victims for fourteen years of our credulity and our indulgence; defeated, not by French armies, but by the pitiful eloquence of the proclamations of their agents." This time they have lost their footing forever: "we must, by a final act of national authority, forever ensure the empire of liberty in the country where we were born... the day has arrived, this day which must eternalize our glory, our independence." Elsewhere, continues Jean Jacques Dessalines: "I raised my arm, held back for too long, over their guilty heads. At this signal, which Our God, Good-God, provoked, your hands, holy armed, brought the axe to the ancient tree of slavery and prejudice." The thought of Our God, Good-God, or GwqmrtLa, is the basis of the reality carried by the semantic content. All that is - as, consequently, all truth, the two go hand in hand - is only in Our God because He is the Only Thing. What comes from Him is the Epiphany of His Being. The Gwqmunal Resistance comes from His Breath, it is breathed into us from Our Being, which draws its laïté or laïté, its being-there, from its own in order to manifest His Presence. Hence Our Superiority, that is, being in harmony with oneself! Regarding the Gwqmunale Resistance, Bukmqn, on this August 14, 1791, invites us to “listen to the Voice speaking to us from within.” This Voice is Us, what we are, this Divine Thought, our Essence, in which is inscribed the Necessity of Being in oneself, by oneself, and for oneself. Wasn't it Jean Jacques Dessalines who told us that our "regeneration is the result of Divine Decrees"! Our God speaks to us through our Being, its internal constitution. The same idea returns at the end of the Constitution, One and Only, this time to emphasize that "they are immortal," the "Decrees," which signifies the endless actuality of the Empire of AYITI. In other words, the Empire of AYITI that we constitute is and will always be current. The Empire of AYITI has no end because it is the Manifestation of Our Munal Being in the sensible world.

There is no evidence when the mental entity of the whiteist being is brought to light as such. Everything continues as if nothing had happened. It persists and signs, this inferiority, a thing not ofowu. The whiteists will not give up wanting to return, even in the face of the proven Ancestral Unbreakability, it is impossible for them, so: "Let it come," says Dessalines, "this power mad enough to attack me!" Faced with this fact, the Eternal Victor of whiteism continues in these terms: "Generals, officers, soldiers! The moment is approaching when you will reap new laurels. Do not get drunk on a few successes unworthy of your value, obtained over bastard and degenerate men; remember that you have to fight enterprising enemies, famous for the crimes with which they have blackened themselves, but who have more than once felt the weight of your arm, and whose destiny will always be vanquished by your heroic constancy. Sieges to sustain, assaults to deliver, this is what the imminent conclusion of peace in Europe has in store for you. They will finally shine, these days marked to consolidate in these places the Edifice of Liberty and Independence. Let us know how to take advantage of them!” This is the only language he knows. What could be more wonderful for US! We have tangible proof, whiteness is a being, if we can speak of it in these terms, given the falseness of the thing. Made of nothing, therefore of emptiness, because that is human pathology, whiteness risks everything and confronts everything without any elevating feeling. For it, reality does not exist, only what emanates from it matters. That is re-creation. It models everything on the emptiness of its being. There is nothing more vile, the being of thought. We experience it daily. Whiteness always returns because it can in no way renounce itself. It is enslavement. Acting in accordance with himself is entirely sensible, according to him, especially since he cannot do otherwise. His one and only goal is to surround us, hinder our own activity, which is commanded by our quintessence, and possess us in order to found upon US, the Blacks, his empty being.

Conquer to erect the edifice of his thought-being

The feeling of being human is to build oneself upon other beings, either enslave them or possess them, people, animals, in short, the living and the non-living, in short, the whole world, to give him, in fact, the posture of man, as he is thought of. Whiteism, just like man, because it emanates from it, defines himself as outside of nature, that is, the world, which, according to him, attributes to him superiority over everything, a sort of divinity, nominal, certainly, something as empty as himself. He is therefore inhabited by the thought of master and owner of all things. He cultivates the same attitude towards other people that he has towards nature. They are possessed, in his sense. As for people, Aristotle will call them "instruments of production," whiteness, "chattel." What these vocabularies contain, things that must be constantly and forever around him, at best in his court, a kind of graft, so that he can constantly trample them, since he opposes their own way of life. Therein lies the whole problem, what is called enslavement, it, "slavery." Whiteness is always ready, in all good conscience and even proudly, to degrade, sully, persecute, murder, which is whiteism, anyone, anyone, anyone who resists it. He is, according to his feelings of himself, in the absence of others even if he needs them to feel that he is. Whiteism is the spirit of contradiction, hence its danger. Also, it cannot do without conquest, "the most natural thing in the world," he says, to establish itself, either its being, then "slavery," or the park. It must be there. This explains the fact that it always comes back, a pian!

The Change in Vocabulary

The character of the whiteness we have just outlined calls for or justifies the following. This is the way things are going. Let's see! Indeed, the Black experience is nightmarish for whiteness. Let us recall the following famous testimonies: "Rouvray (1785): "A slave colony is a city threatened with assault; one walks on barrels of gunpowder there"; Governor Blanchelande: "The insurgent forces were formed exclusively of Blacks,... (...) "... only the slaves are openly revolted, and kill their employers and burn down their homes." The whiteists understand very well that the Resistance comes from the words "slave" and "slavery" as well as the attacks they undertake in accordance with these terms. However, they cannot give up. "Slave and slavery" these two words go hand in hand. They come up with a new strategy, which consists of banishing this vocabulary from their language. Why? They concluded that these words visibly disturb the Negroes. This is frankly idiotic because it is neither the attempts at incarceration, nor the conditions of detention, nor the height of horror, nor the science, the Dqmbala, that they have of themselves, but the vocabulary. These are people, the whiteists, who are incapable of surpassing themselves, worse still, unsuitable, by their being of thought, for objectivity. Hegel and his colleagues speak, no doubt, of their gang. We must not seek to understand the products of the excellence of human gifts, in the reduced sense of the term. This is very particular. It is undoubtedly the effect of the monstrosity and the true cannibalistic character of their being of thought, Jean Jacques Dessalines will explain. To alienate the Negroes and Negresses, the idea of ??abolishing slavery came to him, through Sonthonax, by the White movement. What does this entail, one might ask? The answer follows:

"Article 2: All Negroes and mixed-bloods currently in slavery are declared free to enjoy all the rights attached to the status of French citizen; they will, however, be subject to a regime whose provisions are contained in the following articles...

Article 9: Negroes currently attached to the dwellings of their former masters will be required to remain there: they will be employed in the cultivation of land No. 3..."

Félicité Sonthonax certainly lacks logic. We don't believe he understands his speech. If he decides to go ahead with it anyway, it is because of the spirit of contradiction that permeates him as a White movement. He has an idea, he says to himself, by the divinity savqn in him, that it will show itself. To understand this text well, it is necessary to remember that this abolition of slavery is not the project of our Ancestors but of the whiteness which seeks to present the thing in another way, that it happened after their Victory over it in 1791-92, that there is no longer a French colony, that the people in question are rooted in themselves, that the counter-war which they have just won is a Divine Decree, that they have always lived under their own Direction and that they are brought here by the raid under the pretext that they are slaves and that they are to be governed by the whiteists, their master, that is to say the one who governs them by dictating their thoughts, and owner, and work for the whiteists. That is the picture, let us understand it well! We do not know what the white commissioner calls slavery after its abolition. The content of the term is and remains the same. We see, and this is of extreme importance, that the self-knowledge of our Ancestors, which presents itself as being in itself, by itself, and for itself, is rejected by the proclamation and that, above all, they remain, according to the text, under the influence of whiteness, either in its court, in the shadow of whiteness, without being asked anything, in other words, so they have no say. They continue to live, always according to the text of abolition, under white domination, or in white thought, which amounts to saying under a master, and they are necessarily property of the whiteists. This is called the abolition of slavery, something that is thought by "beings" enjoying the excellence of intellectual capacities. If we take all this at face value, there is no doubt that the whiteists are pure idiots. They were already close. We see that intellectual capacities are not strong. It is we who are in the position where the whiteists are and they are at the height they have made us because we have destroyed their project under the Voice of our being, which is our internal Substance. There is no greatness in the excellence of gifts. Everything is in the bÅnqy, an element of our internal constitution. No Negro or Negress can be under the umbrella of the excellence of gifts because they live At the global level, the cataclysmic situation brought about by the Blancist re-creation project. The abolition of "slavery" by French Commissioner Léger Félicité Sonthonax is limited to canceling the use of the word. This abolition of "slavery," and this is the point of the speech, will become the operating manual for the self-expression of all Blancists. In other words, they now operate under the guise of the abolition of "slavery" and necessarily the use of the word "slave." It's not crazy to say that, with Blancism, the more things change, the more they stay the same. The unidirectionality of Blancism is evident from all sides.

This is the new strategic day that the return brings! In 2011, French President Nicolas Zarkozy visited Karukera, also known as Guadeloupe. To ostentatiously mark his opposition to the Ancestral Country, a Country founded at Independence, and to highlight his own whiteness, he exclaims: "Guadeloupe is French." Yet "Guadeloupe" is Black and France is white, only by complexion do they oppose each other. There is more. The continent of origin of each of them is at the antipodes of each other. As for the content of essence and, consequently, of way of being in the world, "Guadeloupe" is Black Munale while France is hommale and whiteist, a true active cannibal. What then is Karukera doing in the institutional court of France? She is there as a victim of whiteness: “I want slaves in the colonies,” says France. “Freedom is a food for which the stomachs of Negroes are not prepared. I believe that we must seize every opportunity to give them back their natural food except for the seasonings that justice and humanity demand. I believe that we must send a considerable force to Guadeloupe, not to reduce it to what it was but to what it must be.” All this is under the reign of “the abolition of slavery.” All the ingredients are there. This happened on November 14, 1801, and Sonthonax proclaimed the abolition of slavery on August 29, 1793. What can we say about the Eternal Empire of AYITI! On March 16, 1802, Bonaparte wrote to Leclerc, let us remember: “From the moment you have gotten rid of Toussaint, Christophe, Dessalines and of the main brigands, and that the mass of blacks will be disarmed, send back to the continent all blacks and men of color who have played a role in the civil unrest." “Civil unrest” is the end of slavery by our ancestors in 1791-92. The abolition of white “slavery” is not about returning to one's pre-conquest life. We don't know what that means, since the obligation to remain there, under the power of whiteness, has never weakened and has even strengthened. Whiteness must not be thwarted in any of these rights; they are exclusive to it. Conquest has no end and cannot be reversed. It cannot do without the people or things without which it does not exist.

We must be careful not to think, even for a second, that the idea that “conquest is the most natural thing in the world” is conditional and only valid for a time. Anyone who believes in the temporality of this proposition reveals themselves to be ignorant of the doctrine of natural rights, which constitute the substance of the “individual,” to which man is reduced, according to Thomas Hobbes, English political philosopher, a creator of the 17th century, of whom I am a specialist, and of political philosophy, especially Hobbes. This doctrine is the foundation of today's practical political system. It does not deny the idea of ??conquest. Thomas Hobbes even makes it a logical necessity in his thought. But we must say nothing of all this—this is the received idea—because practical politics does not strip things bare as Aristotle does. It is the place of cunning, one of the qualities of man. Practical politics is pure Hobbism without saying so. We must not disturb; we move forward without naming it. The doctrine of banning the use of the word “slavery” in order to be able to move forward with the least possible obstacle applies, successfully, in practical politics, see on this subject my work “HRH HIS MAJESTY PRINCE WEBER TIÉCOURA DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS CHARLES JEAN BAPTISTE, POLITICS OR SLAVERY TWO INTERCHANGEABLE TERMS AND THE ETERNAL EMPIRE OF AYITI AS A STOPPER, LOF EDITIONS (LEKBA/OGU/FWEDA. There is nothing surprising in this, the philosopher of Malmesbury was a translator of the thought of the Stagirite. He was naturally influenced by it. The man of the natural rights of man is a conqueror, a conqueror without limits. Hobbes’ political thought is an adjustment of the thought of “slavery”, slavery, as we know, of which politics is the shaping, this thought which has crossed all cultures that would become, in part, the essence of whiteness. Whiteness knows no time. It also knows neither place nor limits. It has spread across the entire planet Earth. According to it, all spaces there belong to it by right, natural Wnd mental, of course, whether they are inhabited by non-whites or not, by other animal species or not. It invades in all good conscience wherever it wants and whomever it wants. By its mere presence, it dispossesses them in action of themselves and all their goods and resources to become the first and sole owner. The doctrine of natural rights consolidates and reinforces this practice, and it is necessarily one of the characteristics of whiteness, starting with "slavery."

We will never tire of saying it: whiteness is first and foremost an impulse of thought; it is reduced to nothing but hot air. To escape this state, it believes, it must move from thought to action. Force is then the first element it must rely on. The second, where the first proves weak or insufficient, is cunning. We saw this with Léger Félicité Sonthonax. One of the means of cunning is to attempt to break the Ancestral Resistance by obscuring their actions, through speech, certainly. This only works among men like him. The word "man" is here taken in the Negro-divine sense of the term. Later, he may have people of a different nature. Through this absorption, he will manage to establish himself there more or less comfortably. The benefit of all this, when the staunch resisters can prevail over him, is that he arranges to use his peers, even if he doesn't recognize them because of their complexion, to sign an agreement, which always works to his advantage. He constantly aims, through his filthy means, to keep the assets and resources and control over the organization's direction and policy in order to continue to be there despite everything. He resorts to many tricks to stay there. His first, indeed only, adversary is you. He seeks in every way to defeat you for the benefit of his chimerical self. He must conquer nothingness; his life is reduced to that, nothing but that. Hence his incessant, sinister movement. Just as his project of being, which is his entire being, does not involve the movement of return; it is one-sided, so too does it know no bounds. This explains the fact that whiteness is the only group of living beings that is everywhere on earth.

The infinite relevance of this is reflected in the following:

The relevance of our identification with the "slave" is confirmed in the dictionary definition of the word "negro," and even that of "negress": "1. In French: A person who prepares or writes anonymously, for someone who signs it, a literary, artistic, or scientific work" (Le Petit Larousse, Large Format 1993). This definition invisibilizes, not without vassalizing him, the “negro,” and therefore the Negress. On this point, the definition takes up the idea expressed in the European anthropology presented above. As for the novelty, we will return to it later. These ideas, in essence, are the very meaning of the word “slave,” as conceived since antiquity. The act of writing or producing for someone other than oneself is what they call “slavery.” The basis of the definition we have just seen is not the vassalage of the “negro,” because such a state is unreal, but an imaginary dependence, which is rooted in the idea that whiteness has, above all else, of itself, its own appreciation of itself. Everything, at the level of being, starts from itself, here whiteness. The “negro” is judged in relation to the whiteist, who, unilaterally, places him in an inferior position. Language is oneself, one's mirror, in other words, it is what one is, one's feelings, one's ideas, and thus one's whole self. Language is therefore not in itself, it reveals its inventor, the original people. Just like language, which is logical, the word is transparent. The word "negro" is a culture, it highlights the vision of the whiteist world by mentally subordinating the Negro, the Negress, to the white, the term is here taken in the sense of observable differential characteristics not of substance, deep meaning. Through the definition, the actuality of the distinction between the white and the Negro is on display. The definition recognizes, contrary to older conceptions, the excellence of the capacities of the Negro, of the Negress, but nevertheless maintains him or her in the initial mental position. The authors were not unaware of the powerful foTce of the Negro bÅnqj because Volney, quite astonished by the misguidedness of the Europeans, spoke of it to reject their position. We saw this above. What the definition reveals is not the excellence of the gifts; it is not pointed out, but the subordination and, therefore, the invisibility of the Negroes, and above all, this is very important, despite the excellence of the gifts. The definition highlights, even today, the imagined nothingness and so desired by the Negroes and Black women by the whiteists. It is a civilizational alliance between the destroyers, the devils thirsty for being by blood, what Jean Jacques Dessalines calls the real cannibals. We do not forget that these authors whose objective is to zuizit, riennize, the Negroes and Black women with a view to enslavement, come from the Enlightenment, moments of confirmation of the re-creation. By the definition, which carries the flames of the Enlightenment, forces of whiteism, wants to draw attention to the initial mental position because it is, in a way, the adjustment of the conception of the Negro and the Negress of the whiteists to today's reality. It must also be seen as an attempt to thwart the manifest excellence of Negro capacities, therefore of bÅnqj, because the old definitions do not stand up to the epiphany of the excellence of this one, which the whiteists spent all their time denying, in order, of course, to feel that they were, a way of circumventing the evil of being that gnaws at them mercilessly. However, this does not apply to everyone because there are plenty who continue to openly spit on Negro-Gelefwean production. They are certainly more stupid than their comrades. The new source of justification comes from the empty divinity of whiteism, since man created gods in his image to appropriate them in return. This source is: “god says and it happens.” Magic is resorted to. One thing is certain, the definition in question in no way diminishes whiteism’s conception of itself because it maintains the Negress and the Negro in their initial mental position. To provide such a definition of the Negro and the Negress in the era of the abolition of slavery or "slavery" and at the time of the "proclaimed abolition of slavery" is, without a shadow of a doubt, to loudly affirm one's invincible attachment to one's enslaving nature. Man, especially whiteness, which is one of its derivatives, is only in human pathology. Through the residue of this pathology, one hopes to overcome the Evil of Being, its Siamese twin, which constantly assailants it. This is why whiteness persists in maintaining "slavery," that is, enslavement!

There can be enslavement where there is no whiteness because enslavement is human and humanness cannot be reduced to whiteness. However, where there is whiteness, there is necessarily slavery because the former cannot exist without the latter. When whiteness proclaims the end of "slavery," it is then that it is in bloom because the two are inseparable. Wherever there are Black people, there are whiteists. Whiteist authority is there and remains as stiff as a macaque's tail. Didn't French President Nicolas Sarkozy say: "Guadeloupe is French"! Isn't the Pays de Busa, Barbados, within the sphere of English authority? What about Jamaica, the Pays de Nany, and all the others, all this despite the fact that "slavery" affecting Black people is specified and declared a "crime against humanity"! What should we understand by this? Does it imply slavery?

Above all there is this: "I raised my arm, for too long, on their guilty heads. To this signal, that our God, Bon-Dieu, provoked, your hands, armed, carried the ax on the ancient tree of slavery and prejudices. In vain for the time, and especially the hellish policy of Europeans, had surrounded him with a triple brass; You have stripped his armor, you have placed it on your heart, to become (like your natural enemies) cruel, ruthless. Like an overwhelmed torrent that rumbles, tears off, trains, your avenging passion has won everything in its impetuous course. Thus perish all tyrant of innocence, any oppressor of the "human" genre-Munal- ", Jean Jacques Dessalines, April 28, 1804. We will reduce it:" To this signal, that our God, bon-Dieu, provoked, your hands, armed holy, carried the ax on the ancient tree of slavery and prejudices ". Jean Jacques Dessalines knew very well that Félicité Léger Sonthonax claimed to have abolished the slavery. He was present and had participated in the destruction of French activities. However, he claims, on behalf of all negresses and negroes, the abolition of "slavery". He rejects the disaster statement from Sonthonax. In our Constitution, the eternal winner of Napoleon Bonaparte, Jean Jacques Dessalines, says: "Slavery (slavery) is forever abolished". We are in front of an incalculable importance because it is so large. The declaration of the abolition of "slavery", slavery, results from this: "The people living in the island above called Santo Domingo, is to be forming here in free, sovereign and independent state of any other power in the universe, under the name of Haiti Empire". Jean Jacques Dessalines, like all the victorious people, is aware of the immensity of the work: "If some considerations justify in my eyes the august title that your confidence awards me, it is my zeal, no doubt, to watch over the salvation of the Empire, it is my will to consolidate our business, a company that will give us, to nations the least friends Predit their independence to the prejudices of this consideration that the powers never grant to the peoples who, like you, are supporters of their own freedom, who have not needed to beg foreign help to break the idol to which we sacrifice. " Jean Jacques Dessalines announces an indescribable work. He defeats the light and those of their species. As if Cel was not enough, he adds: "Let's walk on other ways" because, he continues, most than tall: "We have dared to be free, dared to be by ourselves and for ourselves". The excellence of Bånqy is highlighted since the word of order is "swear on the whole universe, posterity, to ourselves, to forever renounce France, and to die rather than to live under its domination". This statement is the act of taking control and following its owD way, which is its own being "listening to us that speaks to us." Nègre Kidnapped, deported and implanted here, at the Masuana, which the Whiteists have called America, and the whole Negro population of the ancestors' continent ", underlines Jean Jacques Dessalines it must be understood by that there are no negroes and negresses outside the Empire of Ayiti, wherever they are. Slavery is to be in itself, by oneself and for oneself. Our territory, which is in itself imperial and a property of ourselves, our eternal empire of Ayiti, is inaccessible to whiteists as well as other beings of tribunal, especially to whiteists: "Never no colon or European will set foot on this territory as master or owner. This resolution is - now the fundamental basis of our Constitution. "There is only one territory since there is, in conclusion, only an imperial people, wherever the Negresses and Negroes. Thus the abolition of "slavery", slavery, this sound sequence, has the meaning that the Empire of Ayiti gives it. In other words, the abolition of slavery, in the white sense of the term, is not one. The reason is simple, it is not in line with reality. So it's an empty term. "Slavery" is forever abolished ", Jean Jacques Dessalines.

Whiteism around the territory of the Empire of Ayiti, a highly distinguished place

Whiteism, after the physical assassination of His Majesty the Lord Emperor John Jacques Dessalines, is posted on the outskirts of the Lord Empire of Ayiti, wrapped in the clouds of the deceased Republic of AYITI, whose feet were rooted in international organizations because Our Territory is forever inaccessible to it. Several white leaders succeeded Napoleon Bonaparte, the founder, to end up in Canada. It is evident that it continues its activities while integrating into its management followers of whiteism found among the other Black Peoples surrounded in the name of "conquest, the most natural thing in the world." This amorphous multitude, under the leadership of the leader, firmly maintains their deleterious activities against the entire Black Population, necessarily including the Eternal Empire of AYITI, not the Imperial People.

It is interesting to know why Canada was chosen. Needless to say, this organization is one of those born from the belief that "conquest is the most natural thing in the world." On the plundered territories, Canada built its nest, not without instituting Black slavery, one of the cruelest. Unlike others, Canada has not brought this population into the light of day; it has always pushed them as far away from sight and memory as possible. It has obscured them in the sense that it does not consider them as part of the world, to use an expression from there, because no place in history, that of the occupied land, is reserved for them. There, this institution renders Black men and women invisible. To vassalize them would be to honor them, which would be high treason against humanity. They are physically pushed aside and discursively ignored. They are worthless, as far as Canada is concerned. We experience the harshest treatment here.

Let's briefly illustrate all this! "According to the history told there, we, Black Africans, were not among the first arrivals. We preceded them in the person of Mathieu D'Acosta." Yet when Champlain arrived, it was the Black African, Mathieu D'Acosta, who served as his intermediary with the Indigenous people. He spoke their language and that of the whites. Any non-white is capable of appreciating the finesse of the Black Gelefween's abilities."

"It wasn't just Mathieu D'Acosta here. When they, the whites, settled in the land of the Indigenous people, they brought with them a host of kidnapped Black Gelefweens and Black Jelefweens for forced labor, what they called 'slavery.' In all strata of society, 'forced labor,' and therefore enslavement, was the norm. Louis XIV made it official on May 1, 1689. As everywhere else, resistance was very strong. An example of this is the fire started in 1734 by the Negro-gelefweenne, Marie-Joseph Angélique, which consumed nearly half of the city of Montreal, or 46 houses. She was subsequently murdered by the Blancistes. Instead of talking about the burning city, official historians prefer to remain silent. It was nothing because it was the work of the Riens. This is exceptional! New France, through its Blancistes and their descendants, revealed itself to be more royalist than the king. The people here are particularly more imbued with the spirit of Louis XIV than elsewhere. They cultivate a hatred and necessarily an unparalleled contempt for "personal property," a feeling that casts us into the shadows, see on this subject my work: "The Two-Colored End of Humanity, Genesis of the Negro-Divinity."

Republic of AYITI, whose feet were rooted in international organizations because Our Territory is forever inaccessible to it. Several white leaders succeeded Napoleon Bonaparte, the founder, to end up in Canada. It is evident that it continues its activities while integrating into its management followers of whiteism found among the other Black Peoples surrounded in the name of "conquest, the most natural thing in the world." This amorphous multitude, under the leadership of the leader, firmly maintains their deleterious activities against the entire Black Population, necessarily including the Eternal Empire of AYITI, not the Imperial People.

"Hatred is so deep and green that they consider us dead and worse still as not having been. One day while I was doing my lesson, I was talking about the Negro-Jélefweenne presence here in Quebec as in Canada, students almost fell from their chair. One of these said to me "Sir, you and I have not read in the same history books. "What tangible evidence of Eliminrgyo! »

The other whiteists may not have thought of this time, certainly they appreciated it greatly since they joined Canada in the Elimingyo select club. Let's read the following:

"In February and March 1993, in Belet Uen, in Somalia, a breach was made in the ruthless, but silent war, that Quebec and Canada do us (they never openly declared war) by the Canadian army deployed there in the perspective of Elimingyo. ... to the question of amateur cameraman: "What is your stick for?" "The soldier replied:" To beat the Somalian damn, to break their legs and arms ". Another answered a question brought about the assessment so far of his stay: "disgusting, he said, I did not kill enough negroes". It says a lot. "Not killed enough negroes", it means that he has not so far reached the number fixed. In other words, negroes, he killed them. So he remained dissatisfied. However, we did not talk about it here. It remains secret so far. Another soldier expresses himself as follows: "No one dies of hunger here. Behind me, at the police station, people stroll and eat wheat. They never work, they are lazy, disgusting and they stink ”. Has the amateur cameraman asked another soldier: "What is the name of the operation in which the peacekeepers participate in Somalia? The soldier to answer "her name is: Cassengers to the Negroes".

These passages are taken from my work: Quebec and Canada in the Tribunal of the Negro-Divinity ”, LOF, 2004, pages 139-146

This treatment is highly appreciated in the white world, particularly in Canada, whether his political family be X or Y. Indeed "in the year 2000, Lucien Bouchard, Prime Minister of Quebec, expressed it publicly, shamelessly and proudly. Speaking of the holocaust, he said: "This unnameable thing, cannot suffer from comparison." These words were sent in response to another Quebec comrade who, it was said, would have said that other peoples experienced the genocide. The opportunity was too good for the Whiteist, Lucien Bouchard, to send, in the name of the Quebec state, a clear and clear message to the Clear and Net Message Planète, to which many are trying, more and more, to attract attention to the fact that they were, unparalleled, and continue to be with so much zeal. And that, consequently, they are in all points and that the Holocaust is one of these things ", taken from our work:" Quebec and Canada in the Tribunal of Negro-Divinity ". Thus this organization implemented the thoughts of Emmanuel Kant, Voltaire and Charles de Montesquieu, to name a few, which thoughts present the negroes and negroes as pure animals.

These very special whiteists were among the first to pronounce against the erection of the Eternal Empire of Ayiti. The so -called Canadian organization was obviously supported on October 17, 1806 and it supports everything that follows. In 1911 she prohibited the entry of negresses and negroes into the country. Until very recently, less than two decades, there are countries of the Negro continent, the ancestral continent, which had diplomatic relations with it but without it having in return such relations with them, a monstrosity. A politician reported it. If whiteism is for many a strategy, Canada has absorbed it as a reality, even without land.

This is why Canada had obtained the place of whiteist chief of the Republic of Haiti, a white colony, and which it continues to enjoy the title and act similarly, as everywhere else, even when it has become a mass of informed people, a band of Cabris, because of its dismissal by the eternal empire of Ayiti! By the way, this state does not disturb them at all, the Bunda QMR, since they were under the constant regime of the American American president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt: "You have to constantly lift the va-n-pieds against shoe people," he said, "and put people with shoes in a state of tearing each other. This is the only way for us to have a continuous predominance on this country of negroes which have conquered their independence by weapons, which is a bad example for the 28 million blacks in America. " This atmosphere is also specific to slavery targeted by whiteism. There is no need to say that Canada is doing well.

Hunting to be negro, mun

Whiteism, especially through Canada, by means of the ATHA, the tubabu, has undermined the integrity of the territory of the eternal Empire of Ayiti in all its ancestral extent to allow whiteism to continue its sinister work, extreme gravity. The breach is unforgivable because we, negresses and negroes, we are invariably the limit of the bacteria.

However, this transgression is not surprised, everything is posed from the start. The aim of October 17, 1806 aims to reinforce slavery and the Elimingyo to save yourself from the ridicule. We remember that man, especially whiteism, enjoys the excellence of the gifts of the mind. We don't know what it is. Unfortunately for him, ironically certainly, the Ayiti Empire is full, there is no entry or exit. No blow goes, the thing is what it is forever and only in itself. The physical assassination of His Majesty Jacques 1er does not open the door of our country, the Eternal Empire of Ayiti, to any traitor. By definition the traitor is outside the Lord Empire of Ayiti: "Finally swear to continue the traitors and the enemies of your independence forever!" said Jean Jacques Dessalines. Those who collaborated with the spies of Napoleon Bonaparte, were outside and remain outside the Empire of Dessalines. This is understandable because it is only up there and only by the reigning emperor. There is more, the children of the emperor, at best, of the title of emperor, are the guards by "the forces of the state" which they carry in them. The Ayiti Empire is based on "divine decrees", which "are immortal", reports the Constitution. The army is limited to simple obedience and without the ability to deliberate. Faced with this colossal construction, without forgetting the eternity of the thing, whiteism failed simply. Capois Lamort, the physical arm of the Empire of Ayti, being murdered by the traitor Henri Christophe, the military force of the Empire of Ayiti is not operational. With His Majesty the Emperor Jacques II, the Lord Empire of Ayiti is maintained and awaits. Meanwhile the Momale, Whiteism and Tubabu multitude, acts in a vacuum. The Republic of Haiti, the name of Paravent they give themselves, is rooted in the white external organizations, and operates behind the semblance, physical appearance. The void is trying. The sphere of the Lord Empire of Ayiti is frankly distinct from the emptiness of the Republic of Ayiti, a product of whiteism.

The succinct content of the Republic of Haiti

Everything leaves in the initial point, the invasion by the Church. Indeed as regards the French presence in the Karaïbe, it is ordered by the religious Pierre Belain d'Esnambuc within the framework of "the conquest of the slaves is the most natural thing in the world". Knowing all of history, Jean Jacques Dessalines took care to limit the Church to a case of conscience of the unfortunate and unhappy, of people emptied of their munale substance, in short photocopies. Here, it is the Empire of Ayiti, the Self, So Munal, the Self Ofowu, then beings in itself, by oneself and for oneself, walking towards negro-divinity, perfection.

For these reason His Majesty Jacques 1er, to those who are Christians, says this: "The law does not admit a dominant religion.", It is an obvious way of saying that the Church does not lead here and that it has nothing to see. Specify it says a lot. And it was necessary, to distinguish the eternal empire of Ayiti from European criminal organizations, said country. "Freedom of worship is tolerated," he continues, in other words, those who walk in the path of the Church or religion, it is your personal business: "The State does not provide for the interview of any worship or any minister", which means: know that, having nothing to do with the Church, because the foundation of the slavery, the Empire to the life of the people of the Church. It is not secularism, as some people are brought to believe in it-the Empire of Ayti is at the antipode of the Church-, but the distinction between the so-called countries, whose Church is the basis, and the Empire of Ayiti, based on Self Munal, then in our God, Bon-Dieu, as our ancestors taught us. It is a vis-à-vis between two worlds excluding each other. To put it in an obvious way, religion is therefore outside the affairs of the Eternal Empire of Ayiti, and for good reason. We must never forget that the foundation of the Empire of Ayti is our God, Bon -Dieu, be the true God, and that the Republic of Haiti is the product of the slave god -we have seen it above -, a source of "our misfortunes", which gods is called "the gods of whites". Bukmqn is not clear on this, "Our God, Bon-Dieu, he says, orders us to fight him and defeat him", the gods of the Whites, that is to say the gods of men. Bukmqn even recommended us to “never believe in this god”, because of his falsity. This mental monster has nothing to do with us and our Ayiti Empire. The white god - term signifying man created gods and then appropriated so that it can be done, that is to say, establish a domination on earth - comes from our natural enemy. Even Aimé Césaire, the one who is and remains at the origin of the departmentalization of the countries of our ancestors, which means slavery, then a contradiction in terms, opposed, during his lifetime, that his funeral is sung by the Church. All in all religion, what is logical, is outside our divine and ancestral country. Once again the two are antipodic. This is how we recognize the country of our people, the eternal Empire of Ayiti.

Religion and Republic of Haiti

Yet religion, particularly that which has proclaimed slaves the negresses and negroes, which ordered their slavery and which reigns in each colony, is one of the properties of the Republic of Haiti. On October 17, 1806, he was brought back to oppose fiercely, this in all directions, at the Empire of Ayiti. It is the date chosen by whiteism for its return attempt. On this day the whiteism establishes the Republic of Haiti, appellation of camouflage, which is necessarily a slavery, and we read in the Constitution of December 27, 1806 what follows:

“Article 35.

The Catholic religion, apostolic and Roman, being that of all Haitians, is the religion of the state. She will be specially protected as well as her ministers.

Article 36.

The law assigns to each minister of religion the extent of its spiritual administration ”,

It must be deduced that slavery is back and that its form is the Republic of Haiti. Tangible proof, the assassins returned, through the Church their soul, as "master". In the distribution of tasks, the church found its place to train people. She is in action. She writes history and school manuals. She approves and disapproves. In all schools, she teaches young people religious morality. She forces young people, and even parents, to go to church. She beats and punishes. By using the Bunda QMR, it leads to needs, a cultural campaign, which consists in systematically destroying, either materially, all that is linked to ancestrality, our mode of being in the world, there in our territory, the territory of the eternal Empire of Ayiti, territory of our ancestors, negresses and negroes, whose essence is to be in itself, by itself, And elsewhere, it's not better. The business is very serious.

Political society, as they say

The other aspect of slavery is law. The constitution of "slavery" states the color of political society: "Article 6 of the Constitution. Human rights in society are freedom, legality, safety and property." This foundation guides the march of the other part of things, activities. It should be noted that it is a question of the thought of whiteism, the anthropology of the rights which organizes society. The situation here is identical to that of religion. The thought of human rights is essential. To give even more precision on this subject, let's pay attention to this: Jean-Louis Roy, secretary general of the ACCT, is addressed in these terms to the Negroes and Negresses: "There is one thing that is not negotiable, it is respect for human rights. On this, the international community must share the same standards: political rights, economic rights and social rights ”. This confirms that whiteism is in action from the first day. Is it not estimated to be the master of the Negroes and Negresses only to express themselves!

Who says master, claims the title of owner. Whiteism proclaims the owner of all the property of the Empire of Ayti, underground riches, everything, for example, Canada expels a gold mine, on the territory of the Lord Empire of Ayti, to appropriate it to the advantage of one of its Montreal citizens. Let's repeat it in another way! He expels the people of the imperial people to seize our gold. The facts of this kind are legion.

Slavery is not without murder, killing, genocide, rape, ill -treatment of all kinds. Whiteism, by the Republic, does not deprive itself of it, see on this subject the decree of Tuesday June 4, 2024, titled: "Pure truth: Installed for revenge".

There is another fairly interesting point in matters of the distinctive line of the Republic, which is slavery. We have just seen the Church in its place of foundation, the thought of philosophy-political, man of natural rights as objective of political organization, possession of goods and resources, etc. This point is the very reason for the Republic of Haiti. The historian professor, Jean-Pierre Le Glaunec, author of the book: the indigenous army The defeat of Napoleon in Haiti, is categorical on this: "The origins of the Battle of Vertières," he argues, "is at the heart of this" French "revolution. What does he mean by that?" By their actions, in fact, pursues the Glaunec, the slaves claim their right to humanity and Ideological of the French revolution they express, beyond the race, the universal scope ". Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines d'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste

Princess Eugenia Dessalines and her husband of Orleans Charles: The City of Dessalines answers you: Here is the victorious principle of our struggle in this world with the collaboration of Cino Clyford and CQ Vizion Munal the Lof (Lekba Ogu Fweda) editions)

A tension is clear between the work of Jean-Pirre Le Glaunec and that of Alain Turbier, "when the nation asks for accounts", certainly not on all points. In history as told by Professor Le Glaunec, there is no break: the "slaves" are also at the origin of the battle for independence, as we have seen, independence in humanity, which is a slavery because in France. However, in terms of Alain Turnier, a historian too, he claims that "independence is the project of Dessalines". This strikes us, from the outset, on one point, namely that Jean Jacques Dessalines is not the ancestral people. The latter chose him after pushing the French to the ridge at Pierrot to lead him to GWQMULITY. He simply recognized the invincibility of the child raised by Agbawaya Toya. This misstep does not decrease here what we want to emphasize. The idea that author Alain Turbier wants to note is correct. The invincible Jean Jacques Dessalines is the indisputable figure of GWQMUNNANCE and is undoubtedly opposed to France: "What do we, says the eternal winner of whiteism, Jean Jacques Dessaalines, in common with this executioner?" "The extent of the seas," he replies, separate us ". Come on (we get closer to them? We doubt it: "And what a dishonorable absurdity to defeat to be slaves," he continues. Slaves! "Let us leave the French this qualifying epithet; let's walk on other stage frights". We are far from France, it is without appeal. There is more: "if it could exist among you a lukewarm heart, which it is away and it is up to us.

Let us swear on the whole universe, posterity, to ourselves, to forever give up France, and to die rather than to live under its domination.

To fight until the last sigh for the independence of our country! So the GWQMULITY has nothing to do with the mode of being of France, which is a white organization. Jean Jacques Dessalines, founder of our country, whose name is the Empire of Ayiti, could not be clear: "We have dared to be free, dared to be by ourselves and for ourselves; Imme let's immerse the growing child: his own weight breaks the edge which becomes useless and hinders him in his walk ”. We have expelled whiteism to continue to be in us, through us and for us: "The people living in the island above called Santo Domingo, is appropriate here to train in free, sovereign and independent state of any other power in the universe, under the name of Haiti Empire. "C" is that to separate from France, whiteism, therefore,: "slavery is forever abolished", Jean Jacques Dessalines, the Constitution. Then presenting the Republic of Haiti as the continuity of our history is insane, this is the content of the Republic of Haiti, a system of slavery or slavery, on the soil of GWQMUNNANCE, even if it is rooted outside!

Understanding the thing in another report

What is the situation of populations, at best, of the Negro population in the world today? Should we enter the most deeply possible in understanding the events that take place with a rare cruelty before our eyes to answer the question. This is of great importance. There is a way, not a greater path, in the most important sense, but a single path, in the world. There are no others. However, the situation in which we find ourselves suggests, like an optical illusion, that there is more than a path, at least two. However, in another report, this is not wrong.

Let's go back to the only way! It is, in all directions, the only order, without genesis and endless, and is in our God, by our God and for our God. This order is made by various elements, including the total sum, in their global reciprocal influence, is reduced to Yun, namely a single reality, including our God, Bon-Dieu, Gwqmrtla. In Yunity each element or thing is called to work to perfection, be fulfilled by following its base, which makes it what it is, and according to its specific reality, then without confusing. This effort, the act of getting busy has a line to follow its substance. The effort, specific to the thing we are, since it is she who interests us here, is to seek, a movement, to agree with oneself, whose culmination is called negro-divinity, which is perfection, work completed. The act of agreeing is not done automatically but under the intervention of oneself. This implies a sorting, a sorting which can, in certain respects, be automaticity but, under other conscious and calculated. Sorting is therefore not in itself the gap. It can come here when she goes there. Everything is in the calculation, you have to continue until it goes in the right direction, that of your being. We don't get done, we perfection, that is to say, walking towards ourselves. Any immobility where there is no agreement with yourself leads to disorder, which will be such and so long that we will not head towards yourself, the Self Ofowu, Soi Munal. Disorder is not a way but an empty state. What is part of the system is the movement, which must lead to the internal purpose of the thing.

The second way, of which one has the impression is the disorder, which is not properly a way because it is dead end. It is therefore in itself nothing, which seeks to give itself a effective becoming. It is only limited to that and does not go painless because it is only loss of direction. This is explained by the fact that the false way is carried by thought, which results, in one way or another, from a bad calculation. It is unidirectional, since it has no reference. It is, therefore, unfit for reflexivity, which reduces it to a dead end movement. It depends on the outside to get out of it, the evil here can only be sprayed from outside.

The false path can receive no help because it is just nothing. Yet she is in effervescence. It is because, of course, of its nature of thought. The impossibility of re-creating the real and not being able to act in order to do it in front of the lively desire to transform it, are a source of seismic tremors of all kinds and of any dimension which upset the planet Earth. The movements of this so-called way are alone responsible for the frightening disorder. Its constant, disproportionate, uncontrolled and uncontrollable impact, which comes down in the top of horror, on the one and only way, ancestrality, in order to engulf it by putting in park, what we call slavery, slavery by the very endless fact because it is impossible to destroy such a being, strengthens the destructive forces in all its ends.

This is the man, of which we intend to speak all the time, and which derives whiteism. This deleterious force seeks to put in park our being emanating from the one and only way to achieve its objective. This is done under a burning desire. It seems that if this project was achievable, it would be the gateway to whiteism to become an effective becoming. It is even in this spirit that is done. Slavery. Here we have a clear and clear idea of ??the dizzying intensity under which our natural enemy work. The stated objective does not impact us at all, this because of the impossibility of the thing. From this point of view, we are at peace. What enjoins us to act quickly and consistently until the complete abolition of evil are the effects, at best, the paroxysmal horrors that accompany it.

The white action, the rage of evil, begins with the childbirth of a thought of rejection of our being. This first step is without which man, therefore whiteism, officially called the natural enemy by Jean Jacques Dessalines - we understand why, the impossibility of doing with -, cannot justify his business. Everything stems from this point, in particular our nature, which is pure animality, which is responsible for the reason for our presence in nature, which is to be possessed. The gods of men, the highest justification, has made us, negroes and negresses, slaves and the Church has the responsibility of leaving what is inscribed in the thought of its gods, what it has undertaken by sharing the world and by ordering, by the papal bubble, the particularly invasion of the ancestral continent to reduce us in slavery, that it is said to be a farm. Attachment. The conquest turns out to be fruitful because it took us by default, cowardice - a mode of acting whiteism until today. It could not not be so because of the extreme weakness of reasoning, a line of the fruit of the excellence of the donations. Without wasting time, she faces the back of the medal, the negro counter-offensive, and successfully. But whiteism does not stop coming back, a line of congenital weakness -like a pregnant woman who does not manage to keep the fetus -, and he cannot not do it because his first being is unfit for nesting and his being of thought, a principle of such action, cannot give up himself and that he is only reduced to that. In full denial by the OFOWU, the void, thought without referent, resorts to all the unimaginable horrors to defeat the dazzling opposition encountered but in vain. Despite everything he persists and signs, which is silly on the part of the excellence of intellectual capacities because the irreversible can in no case be defeated. Wanting to go against the tide in such a context is to enter an infernal circle of violence, as the only element capable of hoping. Thus, from this point of view, violence and wanting to be done are one and the same thing.

The divinity-Bois does not have and cannot have a storefront then the technique becomes: gods said and the thing happens. It is an irrefutable fact that this technique does not work here. Violence is the only weapon. It begins with religious morality, which is accompanied by the theology of emptiness as a foundation. This is so because, under the threat, for example, punishment, tests and torture in an inextinguishable fire as last end, then unimaginable happiness, then description, by the very fact, impossible but to death, childish promise, it forces the thoughts of renouncing themselves for the elusive, which is not honorable. The academic puts itself on the services of the same vice by the diversion of his own self of himself to stick it on the person of whiteism which is transformed in principle of being, certainly, in the example of the moral of religion which teaches self-substitution for the Savqn gods. There is politics, in the second degree, which arises as an irrelative sovereign and the principle of law, that is to say what should be done as what is compulsory to execute under penalty of severe and inevitable sanctions. Here it’s kidnapping of the other's self. The economy must be added to the pile, a means of ensuring its subsistence and even more, the possession of all things. This land is the place where we act by skating, we are never sure of anything. What will be his social status of tomorrow? The thing is of great importance because its maintenance in life depends on it. Thus the economy has a regulatory role, at best, binding. Who is impacted, and it is for that, is like a fish in a pool. There is more. The content of all this is the structure of slavery. In addition, the whole of this phenomenon is the basis of social being, which is the factual being and which becomes the opponent of being Ofowu, a real torture, if we are touched. It can lead to the depreciation of life, even to suicide. We say "the factual being" because passions, projects, hopes, etc., result from it, see our book on this subject:

HRH His Majesty Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines d'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste

Prince Rasoir III

The skeletal man of the artificial order of the law

Involuntary slavers by the trap

Collection :

On behalf of the Princess

Atala Dessalines d'Orléans

Field flower

Tome VIII

LOF editions

Lekba/OGU/FWEDA 2019

This is why whiteists hold the negresses and negroes in their courtyard! That's not all. As whiteists cannot achieve their goal by actually nesting the negroes and negresses by what we have just seen, the mere fact of having them in their courtyard, under their laws, therefore at their feet, it must be said as they are since these are the sensations they feel, they spit on them outright. It is in this even that they get their good, in other words, they are there. So they are not ready to abandon their position. These are infrequent beings, whiteists like all those who look like them. You must be wary of whiteist envoys, whatever the reasons they hang on to their visit. They try to influence the current. They certainly don't want you good. You also have to be careful not to sign anything with them. Everything is trapped, you don't win anything. Everything that comes from them bears the imprint of slavery. With this objective they go to our ancestral royalty. They are next to them to better destroy them for slavers. Whiteists are therefore highly unclean people.

Whiteism is the total upheaval of the order of things and it does not go without insensitivity as well as total indifference. It is beyond that Jean Jacques Dessalines draws the conclusion, namely that "France is a monster that the earth engulfs too slowly." The word of France is consubstantial with that of whiteism. The active observation of Jean Jacques Dessalines is, by the conclusion, adequate. Nothing is in itself for a whiteist. Nothing is true, nothing is wrong. Everything finds its justification in the advantage of the empty self of whiteism, in the sense of what it brings positive to its project of being. Hence its excessive monstrosity! Whiteism cannot deprive itself of using something if it believes, even a little, that it can contribute to its effective becoming. It is pushed by its instinctual automaticity, a spiritual, mental impulse, therefore artificial. This is what makes whiteism the shredder of non-living as in the living, particularly Negro and Negresses, and especially an inveterate slavery, then of which Canada is a symptomatic figure!

We and action

We, the victims of the thing, one thing in every way filthy, we have purely and simply abolished the slavery, that they, people with the macabre and destabilizing intentions of the, call shamelessly slavery, and they will comply with no other form of trial because we are invariably in ourselves and that, to be reassured, Compliance with ourselves and that we are on the path of ourselves, either by train to perfection, ours, which is negro-divinity, which, constitutionally internal, we tend incassisibly.

Indescribably heavy and constant crimes in all conscience

The OFOWU crystalization of this purifying and protective impulse is the eternal empire of Ayiti erected under the order of the divine voice in us, our munale essence, in the shadow of ancestrality. On this subject, Jean Jacques Dessalines, on April 28, 1804, underlines: "What is this Haitian vile, what is this Haitian vile, so little worthy of its regeneration, which does not believe that it has filled the divine decrees (therefore eternal), by exterminating these tigers altered with blood?". The Imperial Order Aytien is undoubtedly part of the continual manifestation of the presence of our God, Bon-Dieu, Gwqmrtla. This is why its object is also out of time: "Considering that after a long series of misfortunes and vicissitudes", a reference made to slavery, "it is necessary to ensure the guarantee and safety of citizens in an immutable and irrevocable manner" The letter of appointment of Jean Jacques Dessalines as emperor of Ayiti on January 25, 1804. The timeless period here stems from the rooting of the Empire of Ayiti in our God. It follows that nothing contrary and contradictory has a place there: "If he is a Haitian or a Haitian who does not believe in the divinity of the process, that he or she moves away; indignant nature the pushing our breast or the pushing; that he or she goes to hide her shame away from these places: the air that is breathed in is not made for his coarse organs; This is the pure air of GWQMULITY, which is august and triumphant. "We must understand that our places to us or our space to us, so our country, the eternal empire of Ayiti, is separated from what does not agree with the Ofowu, therefore with these people deemed unworthy, therefore the traitors or Bunda QMR. Divine concordance requires the expulsion of the discordant here. We start "by exterminating the tigers altered with blood"

To reach the abolition of slavery: then "slavery (slavery), known as Jean Jacques Dessalines, is forever abolished". Cleaning is imposed by divine order. It is an order of our God and the Self Munal. Here, fullness! We cannot in any case depend on any other than ourselves. We are the manifestation of the true divinity, our God. What is at the center of the erection of the Empire of Ayiti is not the ill -treatment that evil inflicts us, even if it is, certainly, sufficient to trigger such an attitude, but the spectrum of depending on another than oneself or of being for another than oneself, - it is a question of attempts to get there -, in other words, the Hommal or Whiteist project: "We dare to be free, Let us dare to be by ourselves and for ourselves ”. The proposal highlights the Negro in-name to center it forever on itself. The demonstration returns in everything and everywhere. On May 20, 1805, in Dessalines, the capital of the Lord Empire of Ayti, was promulgated the Constitution: "The people living in the Ile above called Santo Domingo, was appropriate here to train in free, sovereign and independent state of any other power of the universe, under the name of Haiti Empire.". Gwqmunity, the act of leading oneself, is the people, which is doubly yun, first by the self Munal, then Ofowuity, and then by the will to comply, to be with oneself, by retaluating, counter-warning, against our natural enemy. Once again the "Je, Gwqmun" is highlighted. The "I or Muc" rejects those who are not him, at best, who opposes him. It should be emphasized, the excellence of donations keeps breaking their feet in front of the Bånqy. Indeed in the Constitution of December 27, 1806, constitution of the Mirage, that is to say the Republic of Haiti, it is said: "Article 1. There cannot be slaves on the territory of the Republic; Slavery is forever abolished. "Let us be careful for thinking that the Paravent Republic can be part of the courtyard of the" muc or I "! There is, first of all, the fact that the proposal for the abolition of the Republic of Haiti is without extent, in other words, it is limited, which opposes it to that of the constitution of the Empire of Ayti, which is general and global, starting with the large negro population of the earth since erection is their own work. Wherever we are, the statement is effective, it is the content of our being. It is even slavery that is deleted, this in all its extent and all its dimensions. This is what explains the following statement: "Our laws, our customs, our cities, everything still bears the French imprint". The sentence underlines an anachronism, a disturbance, then a serious problem in the field of organization, namely that French thought, outside, leads. In other words domination, and with it its justification, either the sub-man or the slave and the master, is still in force. The "muc" reacts spontaneously against inconsistency, therefore disorder. Living in the thought of someone other than yourself is to be under your domination is now a secret. Such a state means being “slave”. Yet the fact underlined and rejected by Jean Jacques Dessalines is a priori the order of the Republic of Haiti. Indeed in the Constitution of December 27, 1806, the Church regains its place and secondary policy was rooted in the doctrine of human rights. There is the Napoleon code, finally there are lots of other things. So we are not in the introductory reality of the Ayiti Empire. Before the government by the thought of the other, Jean Jacques Dessalines expresses himself in these terms: "And what a dishonorable absurdity than to defeat to be slaves", that is to say to be led by the other. The Republic of Haiti is undoubtedly slavery, according to the thought of Jean Jacques Dessalines. This is not in contradiction with that of others in this matter. Let's go again: to be “slave”,

It’s living in the thinking of the other. We "walk on other ways," says Jean Jacques Dessalines, when we live in our thoughts. It is not for a time but forever, at the height of the Empire of Ayiti: "Considering that after a long series of misfortunes and vicissitudes, it is necessary to ensure the guarantee and safety of citizens in an immutable and irrevocable way." The appointment of Jean Jacques Dessalines like the Emperor of Ayiti, on January 25, 1804 "The same thought returned later, on April 28 of the same year and it is Jean Jacques Dessalines himself the speaker. Indeed after accepting the title of emperor, he says in his speech: "May my successors follow the march that I would have traced them! This is the most suitable system to consolidate their power: it is the most worthy tribute that they will be able to pay to my memory. " The eternal winner of Napoleon Bonaparte, then whiteism, does not speak of another country to come. There cannot be a question of one after the Empire of Ayti. Most than large, Jean Jacques Dessalines, is in a logical setting, inside the Lord Empire of Ayiti. The Empire of Ayiti being eternal or immortal, it cannot be a question of an after. This means that we are forever distant from slavery. This is not the case of the Republic of October 17, 1806. So it is a mirage to say: “There cannot be slaves on the territory of the Republic; Slavery is forever abolished. "The annihilation of this article leads to another, which follows:" Article 27. No white, whatever his nation, will be able to set foot on this territory as a master or owner. " The master is the one who commands by dictating driving to others. Through religion and politics, white reigns. There is more. The whites are already there, they are educated by the attempt. To go further, they prepared attempts. Their rights to be emerged with the Republic of Haiti: article 28. "Haitians are recognized as the whites who are part of the army, those who exercise civil functions, and those who are admitted in the Republic to the publication of this Constitution." These articles, which are those of the constitution of the Ayiti Empire, are integrated into this illogically white vomit. It’s the Subterfuge of Sononho spitting, slavery under another name. The “owner”! Master and owner go to company! In other words there is no master without owner or one cannot be a master without being a owner. The last is the predicate of the first. Of such an inconsistency does not surprise where we act against the current. The slavers of Negro slavery have used, with full knowledge of the facts, in the Sononaxic so as not to abolish "slavery" as stated by the Lord Empire of Ayiti as well as international laws, their legislation, must be said. What a cowardice to seek to subtly slip into the life of the other to manage to get their hands on him against himself without him realizing it! This means that the natural enemy violates laws with full knowledge of the facts. So all the heavy and constant crimes, a cruelty to the highest point, are committed in all conscience as in all good conscience.

The slavery of the Revidence of Haiti proven

We want, in a special way, draw your attention to a point of Dessalinian importance. History, such as Professor Jean-Pierre Le Glaunec presents it, is wind. However, it is not illogical. It is part of the white apocalyptic logic at the end of negresses and negroes. To understand all of this, we must go back to the design of the negroes and negresses of whiteism as we have it highly exposed. According to them the negresses and negroes are pure animals. The reason given is the weakness or absence of intellectual faculties. However, the substantial content of whites is these. This is what makes them men. DESTHONAX says that the Negroes and Negresses have "entered the existence by the abolition of slavery". Jean -Pierre Pierre Le Glaunec, for him, to continue, takes up the idea that by the war of independence, particularly on November 18, 1803 and only on November 18, 1803, the "slaves affirms their intention to rise to humanity" - the one in which we are in question We saw above-whose absence has imprisoned them in pure animality. In order to justify the Republic of Haiti. This dirty and ignoble story, obviously devoid of all reality, subtly invites the Negresses and Negroes, the people of an unequaled and incomparable superiority by their conduct, which is that of being with oneself, their confirmed divinity, to turn away from themselves, the renunciation of oneself, the self Munal, oneself, to the advantage of the degenerate, the whiteism. No one has ever fallen so low! This is irrefutable proof, the history of negroes and negresses diverted in favor of "humanity", all that is most vile on the planet, in order to give a base to slavery, which would finally lead, hopes the greatest evil there, whiteism, to the Eliminrgyo, by the Republic of Haiti, an institution that has not been able to It aims, this story, to bring Negroes and Negresses from all the earth to accept the primary whiteist ideology, as we have seen its sad sketches by these thinkers without substance and settlers, through their indescribable horrors, worthy of their species.

This is its stumbling block because the ancestrality has already crystallized in the Lord Empire of Ayiti. The reverse is improper to him, which is not unidirectionality, of which we often speak, which is something limited in capacity. The whiteist strategy of re-creation of negresses and negroes, carried by Canada, is the VQTMCNC, getting bogged down in the toxic and mephitic smell of your body, which is caught in your own game, because you are followed from start to finish. In this case we do not forget that Professor Jean-Pierre Le Glaunec teaches the history of Haiti at the University of Sherbrooke, Canada, white chief of the late Republic of Haiti. We are entitled to believe that he is perhaps mandated by this antique organization to spread falsity in the hope of being able to consolidate the colony called the Republic of Haiti.

To close this discursive sequence, in addition to the satisfaction strongly expressed by the French emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, on the turning point, according to him, on the island that the French named once again "the French part of Saint-Domingue" and the regular presence of the former French soldiers in the Assembly of Deputies, there is another point of great importance to emphasize. We know it very well that our country, whose name is the Empire of Ayiti, is Gwqmun: "The people living in the island above called Santo Domingo, is appropriate here to train in free, sovereign and independent state of any other power in the universe, under the name of Haiti Empire." The name is in itself transparent in the sense that it makes the thing it is seeing. It is therefore not in itself. It’s like the electric wire and electricity in some way. There are two things here to report in the act of naming, firstly the sound and secondly the meaning. The sound is what is material and the meaning is immaterial. We access it by sound. This makes the name the representative of the element or elements that constitute the meaning. Here the word Empire of Ayiti shows the properties, that is, the definition that We can also call the essence, without which there is no state, and also the whole history, at best science, the dqmbala, true knowledge, which led to the erection of the Empire of Ayti, an exceptional work according to Jean Jacques Dessalines: "If some considerations justify in my eyes the title Auguste that your confidence awards me, it is my own. A company, a company, which will give us, to the least friends of "freedom" not the opinion of a heap of slaves ", in its letter of acceptance on February 15, 1804. So the name of Empire of Ayiti and the meaning are inseparable. Because of this, Jean Jacques Dessalines, the eternal winner of Napoleon Bonaparte, exclaims: "that my name has become horrified to all peoples who want slavery, and that despots and tyrants only pronounce it by cursing the day that saw me born". One of the elements of the Ayti Empire is "independent". In the Constitution of December 27, 1806, this word is “abolished”. The cause is "accession to humanity", either in the shadow of whiteism or France, the two terms, without it being reduced to it, are interchangeable. We are clearly returning to the Sononaxic. In the second constitution, the "independent" word appears. Is there a change? Certainly not. It is that it is the partial independence of the government. 1825: Article 3. We concede, on these conditions, by this ordinance, to the current inhabitants of the French part of Santo Domingo, the full independence of their government. State but "government". One is not the other. Could we speak of dependence or partial independence "? Such things could not be said in the first constitution or in the second. It was necessary to keep it secret. Just as they hide the real name, that is," the French part of Santo Domingo "so as not to highlight what has just happened, similarly they place a screen in front of the case of" independence ". From Ayiti, it was the continuity of slavery, which is forever abolished automatically by the following immortal words: "The people living in the island above called Santo Domingo, is appropriate here to train in free, sovereign and independent state of any other power in the universe, under the name of Haiti Empire." The story of Haiti, of which Professor Jean-Pierre Le Glaunec speaks is that of "slavery", as they say. All attempts to integrate Jean Jacques Dessalines are the fruit of debility, by brains that lack logical meaning, and also crime, by brains for which the meaning of life is crime.

With us, without sharing

Despite all the failure is total because the gwqmunal resistance is constantly increasing. The matter of the Empire of Ayiti is our God, Bon-Dieu and the ancestrality, which implies the true divinity, and the Negresses and Negroes, of all groups, then Yunis during their adventures. The erection is the work of the entire large negro population. Thus the abolition statement is inclusive. You have to understand that slavery is abolished everywhere because the Empire of Ayti, subject of abolition, is that of all negroes and negresses wherever they are. The invincible general and eternal emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines is very clear on this. The intention or the techniques used by whiteists to identify or put in park the negresses and negroes to the advantage of their being of thought necessarily collide with the fierce fight of the large Negro population.

Each Negro community has the authority and the sufficient obligation to severely punish the Whiteists because of their macabre maneuvers on its territory, which is indissolubly linked to the central territory of Ayiti.

Whiteists are in a false door with the Ofowuity, therefore, the Empire of Ayti. There is no need to talk about those, the WRS-Mun, also called Bunda QMR, who support them or who serve as means by which they pass to try their dirty blow. Their situation is identical before the law.

The two groups, given that they form a single and the same reality in essence as in objective, face the same popular vindictive.

We are entering a room in the era of Dessalines, cleaning piece, of which it is impossible to measure the developments. What is certain, the basic effects of the first hour of the gwqmunal resistance are and remain the same but the intensity today is immeasurable. The reasons are clear. In the striking and counter-flash game that whiteism has drawn us against ourselves, The force that barks, cleanses and repairs the road must exceed and far exceeds the one that saves and ugly. In other words the strength that expresses us is seven times, at best, a hundred once, more powerful than the one that attacked us. It is the very powerful and infinite rage to be yourself, that is to say in itself, by yourself and for oneself unconditionally. Everyone of us, through the Lord Empire of Ayti which is our sensitive being, then the irrelative totality of the us, negroes and negresses, like a river overflowing in a torrential rain, will charger inexorably and massively whiteist and Tubabu, in particular Canada, the white chief, and spilled them in the courts, of here, Eyes, to engulf them with all the forces of the law, our laws, as of the law, their favorite object, which they have. The account time is there in our breast. The institutions intended for this are being cropped and reinforced to be able to pay their task. Under the effect of Jean Jacques Dessalines in us, the greenhouse effect of the earth is at + 7777.7 ° C, the contrapocalyptic. Here, it is with us without sharing. Everything, for sure, will go back to Ofowu. So there is no need to say that, by the sole force of the law, we engulf all the apocalyptic figures to which whiteism, especially by the Canal of Canada, has accustomed us.

All those who are on the imperial territory and who collaborate, by far or near, with the Whiteists, wherever they are, are in a state of arrest like the whiteists who are active with us. The great Negro people of all the earth knows them all, they will summon them at the right time.

Any attempt, of any kind whatsoever, against the eternal empire of Ayti, that is to say any member, and any manifest will of reissue of October 17, 1806, are an unforgivable crime and it will be punished with death. Such people are logically also in arrest.

The crime against the Negro and the Negress, also called crime against Busa, is the greatest crime there is. Therefore it is unforgivable and also is punished with death.

Slavery is one or crime against the Negro and Negress.

The discourse of the bestilization of the Negro and the Negress is the crime against Busa because it is the thought of slavery of the Negresses and Negroes.

Any will or attempt to reduce the negro voice to silence, by any means whatsoever, is the crime against Busa because it has the end of slavery.

The negro and the negress, the invincible general and eternal emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines in mind, by the fact that he or she is with himself, that is to say the self Munal, one of the fruits of the manifestation of the presence of our God, bon-god, be Gwqmrtla, is a part of the Katrl, a holistic balance, in the current situation of the planet Earth, that is to say Dewqjmq, and the one and only salutary path, the only means on the move, by the eternal empire of Ayti.

Anyone who, whiteist like Bunda Qmr, is in the imperial sphere falls under our authority. If his life or intention is in full contradiction in our sphere, he or she must expect that he or she is, without notice, put in arrest to be judged to be judged by our law by the People's Tribunal, which is in the process of being shaped.

Any negative purpose towards the eternal empire of Ayiti is Ipso facto the rejection of the ancestors, because of their refusal of slavery, and therefore will be punished with death after the confirmation of the thing by the People's Tribunal.

It goes without saying, any speech or gesture aimed at enduring the mental arrival of the fictitious Republic of Haiti praises the hatred of the ancestors and, therefore, of slavery, will be punished with death after the guilty verdict of the popular court.

Anyone in the informed multitude, formerly known under the name of the Republic of Haiti, Republic of Camouflage, continuing to work for or with whiteism for the Elimingyo, will be punished with death after the verdict of the People's Tribunal. The population is invited to note everything, the cleaning is essential.

Any person or any slave institution demanding a right in our imperial territory in the Gelefwe as in the Masuana fall under crime against Busa. The law will apply in all its rigor.

Anyone, whiteist like Tubabu, or Atha, practicing slavery on any territory of a Negro country and being outside the great imperial territory, will also be accused of all related crimes and will be entrusted to the International Criminal Tribunal to be tried for crime against humanity; She will be transferred, at our request, to the Imperial People's Court to be taken care of for the crimes under our Skill.

The decree is in force today, on February 15, 2025.

Like all other decrees concerning the Ayiti Empire, it is immortal.

For the imperial house Dessalines, the Empire of Ayti, eternal Empire of Tóya-Dessalines, Empire of Gwqmunality, that the enemy and its gang, present on our imperial territory, wrongly believed that they have ever swallowed up:

HRH His Majesty Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines d'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste, 7th of the generation of the imperial couple, Marie Claire Happy Félicité Bonheur and Jean-Jacques Dessalines, III of the line of the emperors of Ayiti, and guarantor of the wander of the lakort, the order of us, and the Tóya-dessalines Empire, specialist and professor of the science of politics, politics, especially whiteism, and theorist of mutism, ie VUDUN existentialism

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/you-do-nothing-surely-die-here-daily-reading-dessalines-d-orl%25C3%25A9ans-cvnce

Rechercher dans ce blog

Forum-Impératrice Claire Heureuse Dessalines, la Ville de Dessalines, Capitale Impériale d'Ayti

If you do nothing, you will surely die! Here is the daily reading of SALVATION!

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Sa Majesté Le Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines D'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste

Décret 1806 – 2019 – 7 - 6 la création des CQ pour la fin de la pauvreté est effective

Comment préparer les plaintes contre les génocides perpétrés contre les Négresses et Nègres ainsi que les crimes contre l'humanité