The order of peoples, regardless of skin color or culture, to counter slavery in every way! The annihilation of peoples, through the annihilation of individuals, is underway—this is the reality revealed in broad daylight!

Google translation, from French to English

The order of peoples, regardless of skin color or culture, to counter slavery in every way!

The annihilation of peoples, through the annihilation of individuals, is underway—this is the reality revealed in broad daylight!

Read the text and act, quickly! You must read it to the end, however long it takes. It concerns you, your life, your future, etc. The action you take after, and even before, reading this text, which has been meticulously prepared for you, will reveal you to yourself. I wish you success.

Share widely, first, and then communicate with everyone to act quickly! Time is running out!

Le Décret 0000000 réponse à l’invasion de la vie des habitants et habitantes de la planète terre 3 janvier 2026

q = an, u = ou =, w = r, r = ê, c = in, h = ch, e = é, ¼ = on, ñ

The original link if needed:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lordre-des-peuples-pour-contrer-dans-tous-les-sens-en-cysue

Visit the following sites:

LinkedIn: HRH Prínce Tiécoura Jean Dessalines D'Orléans;

Blogger: Forum-Impératrice Claire Heureuse Dessalines, la Ville de Dessalines, capitale d’AYITI;

X: @ForumEmpereurje

For all works, consult the Akadémie X website:

https://www.akademiex.com/product-page/tome-6-l-administration-impériale-rétablie-au-pays-ancestral-ayiti

Administration impérial rétabli

Slavery is the crime against Busa, or against the Black man and woman, Earthling, Earthling.

AYIBOBO!

NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!

In Venezuela, on January 3, 2026, this year, the annihilation of the mun, the people, of planet Earth by humankind, this monster, will be revealed in the dead of night, more precisely at two in the morning. Humankind, whose highest point is whiteness, a bacterium that devours Black people, that is to say, Earthlings, is whiteness. We are speaking, of course, of the lakort munal, that is, the so-called thinking beings. What is hilarious about this is that the expression "thinking being" was invented by the beings of the lakort, at best, a small group, to signify the "superiority" of this category of singular beings over others. But according to this same small group, the other beings of the same lakort, who, quite obviously, resemble them, are not endowed with the capacity to think. We need only consult the political philosophy of the Greek philosopher Aristotle to understand this. They claim that these are different, in some cases distinct, categories of being, certainly far removed from men—that is, white men—from whom this small group originates. There is nothing more brilliant. We have seen this in several articles published here, notably “The Ancestral Order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, Our Irrevocable and Immutable Protection in This World of Civilizational Savagery.” What must be understood here is that the events of January 3, 2026, in Venezuela targeted those who have a “human form” but are not men. This small group has its own criteria for humanity. We leave it to them to explain them themselves, for we know that one is never better served than by oneself. It is therefore the emptiness of these beings that was at stake on January 3rd.

What happened that day? A president, through his heavily armed government, invaded the communal group living in that territory, murdered, through his men, all the people in his path, and kidnapped the president and his wife, in return, proclaimed himself master of everything, the territory, the goods, including the people, all of them, then, by the same token, according to the ideology of the “slave” that animates him, proclaimed himself the owner of the known resources of the subsoil and those yet to be discovered, if there are any. The inhabitants of the so-called Venezuelan territory find themselves, in no time at all, being relegated, in full view of everyone, to the ranks of non-beings, in the sense that they are not beings in their own right. The night, the darkness in which the operation takes place, does not signify its secrecy but, according to the president and his men, rather the illusion of their self-perception—in other words, their status as “slaves.”

This is, without a shadow of a doubt, what it is, because this invader-like behavior is specific to enslavement. First, the act of resorting to conquest, then the physical suppression of those who stand in its way, then seizing the leader elected by the people themselves, in order to proclaim oneself, finally, the sole “master”—that is, the one who controls them, who necessarily dictates everyone’s conduct, and who owns all goods and resources, land and subsoil—all of this is characteristic of those who promote slavery.

We say it constantly: the world order, the way of life of those who rely on whiteness, is slavery. It could not be otherwise, since whiteness anthropology is the starting point and the end point of action in accordance with what must be, and this self-perception hierarchizes the Order of Us in the direction of a domination that must necessarily be established or brought about. This way of doing things is extremely offensive. This is what's unfolding before our very eyes. This president isn't crazy, contrary to what some might believe. Oh no, he has both feet firmly planted in the ground, the ground of their pernicious ideology. Can we believe he's the only one behaving this way? No, certainly not! Almost all the heads of state who wallow in the same filthy political education as him wholeheartedly approve of his attitude. In any case, that's what they do too, but silently. We hardly ever hear them talk about this specific point. For all of them, the art of living is nothing more than this. The difference—and we are talking about a real difference—between them and him is that he's frank and less hypocritical, which makes him, roughly speaking, lacking in subtlety. He's not theatrical. That's why he's unpredictable, and therefore difficult to understand. There's also the fact that the others are ruthless adversaries. This is because they are all chasing the same thing, the same prize. They are the perfect product of their thinking being, man. Their interests, because they are identical, take precedence.

This is the cause of their rivalry. The president shines more than the others because of the impressive volume of his heritage and a personal element, the great confidence in him. The place on which the openly crass slaveholder president stands is indeed the philosophy of the natural rights of man, initiated by the English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, which philosophy is the greatest advance in savqnie or savqnery, savagery in system. This place is not a foreign element in political culture, it is its foundation. The Malmesbury philosopher, firstly, justifies the law of the strongest among people, which he calls the "individual", to arrive at peoples and nations to arrive at infantilizing and vassalizing citizenship, through democracy, consolidation of the renunciation of one's natural rights in matters of self-command, the first system of representation in politics, the work of the English philosopher himself, and, secondly, to the state of peoples, an artificial state of nature. Why is the state of people so important to him? The intention is to reduce it to the primary state of nature, the state of “individuals”, in order to justify conquest, which is what we are currently witnessing. The state of conquest of peoples is the second phase of the creation of man. This powerful point is the subject of my doctoral thesis in political philosophy. It doesn't stay there. In the praxis of politics, a new element has been integrated, arising from democracy and the liberal system to objectify man. The institution of modern government, through Hobbes's political theory, gives a preponderant place to money, effective possession, in attempts to bring about man's existence. This is where conquest takes on its full meaning. The action of the shameless slavery president finds its explanation. All things considered, the control over the people, the people and the institution of Venezuela and the tacit agreement, in the case of some, and public, in the case of others, is entirely consistent with the political ideology of Thomas Hobbes, of whom I am the specialist, and the practical politics which is derived from it. PEOPLES ARE IN DANGER! See my works on this subject (at the time of the first work I was in graduate school, fresh and full of passion and rage):

1st work

WEBER TIÉCOURA DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS

CHARLES JEAN BAPTISTE

Letter to Lekba

(on Canadian and Quebec despotism)

sispqn wqse

LES EDITIONS LOF (Lekba/Ogu/Fweda)1994

2nd work

THE RAZOR PRINCE II

Because of the surge of whiteism, irrelative Stupidity, on earth, particularly my people, I see myself obliged to come to the aid of all the victims by giving them a clear and clear definition of the Evil against which they are fighting so that they react promptly and effectively against it. Therefore, Canada is furious with me. Let us observe with our eye on this country.

HIS MAJESTY PRINCE WEBER TIÉCOURA

DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS CHARLES JEAN BAPTISTE

HUMAN RIGHTS ARE ANTI-BLACK II

THE GREATEST AND INDESCIABLE PIH? OF

THE EARTH: WHITENING

Collection:

In the Name of the Princess

Atala Dessalines D’Orléans

Flower of the Fields

Volume VII

LOF Editions

(LEKBA/OGU/FWEDA) 2019

The gross indifference

Someone may maintain that, no, this president is not in his right mind and that he is really delusional. We don't think that's a good thought. The proof is that the vast

majority of people on the planet, among those who are educated on the matter, go about their business without being shaken by what happened in Venezuela and, consequently, do not spontaneously take to the streets to demonstrate their indignation and anger, then immediately, unconditionally, push back the slavery movement. Why would they do that, one might ask? Because the name “slave”, spat on a thinking being, to use their vocabulary, is the biggest attack there is on this earth, because it has no limits - in the field of interpersonal relations, everything is a question of context, which is not stable, and, because the “slave” is the product of the mind, Jean Jacques Dessalines abolished slavery forever - and because it spontaneously calls for the most reaction scathing.

This attitude has no place on the planet, the Alaw¼nbadr Dam of Jean Jacques Dessalines is clear on this. It inspires disgust through the horrible memory we have of it. In fact, the vast majority of the earth's inhabitants are opposed to it. fiercely. In addition to our books, we have talked about this fact extensively in our publications previous ones. Without going into details, because this is not the place to deal with these peaks of horror, for millennia life on earth has been taking place, among several peoples, in slavery, a desire or a very strong feeling to subject others toself. The invented gods all advocate slavery. These savqn deities, who are not that in the head, serve as justification for the enslaving inclination of men. More near us, a little over five hundred years ago, the whiteists invaded all the corners of the planet to conquer the people who live there in order to reduce them to work forced under the pretext that they are, according to their beliefs, natural “slaves”, a indelible task, following their ideology. Everywhere they subject them, not without cunning, to untranslatable conditions. They make them experience the peak of cruelty. It’s up to the people Earthling, that is to say the Negresses and Negroes, that they inflict the hardest blows, in fact, more two hundred million raided, deported and settled elsewhere. The atrocities that followed were cataclysmic. The earth has known nothing like it and will not succeed either. This is not to be wished for. Talking about it is already dizzying. Elsewhere they are hit hard too. The diseases and murders sowed by white people are legion. There are many peoples who did not survive this tsunami of human violence.

This scourge is known to everyone, from experience, mainly by victims, and, on the other hand, by the mind, of course, in the capacity of operator or administrator. In both camps, slavery, necessarily the idea of ??the pretended slave, is rejected but it is not for the same reason. The one who is the subject of it does not want to be the victim.

Why does the established order seem to be breaking down?

Yet, once again, the spectacular invasion of the Venezuelan people fails to rouse the masses. Is it that evil no longer strikes as it once did because it is on the verge of disappearing and, consequently, the threat is no longer real? One thing is certain: because the reaction is not as it once was, we are no longer in the time of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, the one who, after his Eternal Victory over Napoleon Bonaparte, and therefore over whiteness, the greatest evil of all, and thus humanity itself, its very principle, cries out from the rooftops of the universe, even of the A: “I have avenged all the peoples extinct in slavery.” What must be understood here, particularly the second meaning of the proposition, is that what happens to one person, regarding any attack against the Muc, the Munal Substance, which is ours, is everyone's concern, that is, the entire Munal lakort, because Ubuntu, and there are no minor attacks within the framework of the Muc.

The meaning of the statement is the awareness of the other as part of oneself, and their protection is also one's own. We are all concerned by everything that threatens the other in their being. The other is not abandoned. Any attack against them is an entry into war against the Munal Being, and consequently against oneself. Ubuntu, communal unity, in the sense of indivisibility, insubordination, and the eternity of the being that we are, automatically sends the answer. Jean-Jacques Dessalines feels concerned by what happened to the people because, as a communal phenomenon, he carries everyone within him. Let us listen to what he said to those for whom he fought: “I sacrificed everything to rush to your defense: parents, children, fortune, and now I am rich only in your freedom,” the meaning of which is communal unity, that is, the expression and protection of oneself through one’s own movement, an internal movement. In other words, it means that I opened myself, first and foremost, to you in order to recover myself, then or ultimately, in and through you.

More profoundly, this is the expression of unity through interdependence, namely, that one contains the other, the partial withdrawal of oneself for the benefit of the other in danger, ultimately finding oneself fully immersed in the salvation of the other, which is also our own. This is called communal solidarity, meaning that we are a whole, which is Ubuntu. The teaching of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, through these words, is crystal clear. Each individual community cannot exist without the other, the unity that forms the Mun, of which Ubuntu is the actuality. The richness Jean-Jacques Dessalines speaks of here is communal plenitude, through intersingular support, and because as such it is unity, a whole. The richness in action here is therefore consubstantial with communal being, the being that we are.

Unity, or Ubuntu, governs our being—our thoughts, actions, projects, and so on. The same is necessarily true of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. Because of this fundamental realization, which is the very basis of all things, on the level of self-practice, the People entrust the government to him: “A people can only be properly governed by one person, and that person deserves preference, who, through his services, influence, and talents, has been able to build the edifice of our independence and freedom.” Here, the a priori principle becomes evident. For those who don't know who we're talking about, there's more: “Considering that after a long series of misfortunes and vicissitudes, it is necessary to ensure the guarantee and security of citizens in an immutable and irrevocable manner, and that the surest way to achieve this goal is to bestow upon the only leader capable of representing and governing the nation worthily, an august and sacred title which concentrates within him the forces of the State, which controls them externally and which is internally the guarantee of tranquility,” The Act of Appointment, January 25, 1804. What is this “Title” to which our security is linked or on which it depends? Here it is: “Without further regard to the constant and obstinate refusals of Citizen Jean Jacques Dessalines to accept a power that the People and the Army had delegated to him from the time when our independence was proclaimed, since this refusal thwarts the interests, the will, and the happiness of this country, we confer upon the said citizen Jean Jacques Dessalines the Title of Emperor of Haiti and the right to choose and appoint his successor.” Ibid. By this act, “the People and the Army” entrusted him with the Mission of establishing in the world the Eternal Empire of AYITI as the culmination of the Work, and what earned him this was his unity with others and their defense. All this led to the Triumphant Resistance: “If any considerations justify in my eyes the august Title that your confidence bestows upon me,” said Jean Jacques Dessalines, “it is undoubtedly my zeal in watching over the safety of the Empire, it is my will to consolidate our enterprise,” “To Dessalines, February 15, 1804, Year 1 of Independence. The Erection of the Empire of AYITI in the sensible world is its Phenomenality, since the Empire of AYITI is through our Body, that is, its Production as a Manifestation of the Presence of Our God, Good God, and it is, at the same time, the Confirmation of the Act of self-governance, by oneself and for oneself. Dessalines, February 15, 1804, Year 1 of independence. The Erection of the Empire of AYITI in the sensible world is its Phenomenality, since the Empire of AYITI is through our Body, that is, its Production as a Manifestation of the Presence of Our God, True-God, and it is, at the same time, the Confirmation of the Act of self-governance, by oneself and for oneself, which is to “live Independently and Free.” Jean-Jacques Dessalines, beyond his singularity, embodies the communal unity and, in doing so, highlights the Ubuntu of our being, the Mun, the Muc, as it is, a complete being. This feeling, like a magnet, will draw to his door the Venezuelan hero, Francisco de Miranda, and later, still within the same territory, Simón Bolívar, to share the communal knowledge, the Dqmbala, both thus recognizing communal unity, and consequently, to attack one people is to attack all others. There is no way to retreat or remain silent when we are in Jean-Jacques Dessalines.

The question remains. Since this is the case, why is the world today so far from Ubuntu, faced with the threat of man, the white man or the slave owner, at the door of the people of Venezuela?

But where has the Sentiment of Jean-Jacques Dessalines gone today, the unprecedented Sentiment in which peoples reveal themselves to themselves? Where there is the practice of slavery, there is necessarily the Dessalinian Sentiment; it cannot be otherwise, for it is consubstantial with the Munal Being, which is what We Are. Jean-Jacques Dessalines is Self-Affirmation, Mutual Assistance, and Self-Governance, by Self, for Self. The son raised by Agbawaya Toya is the Munal Being at its fullest potential, the embodiment of plenitude. We are not at our first astonishment since the Proclamation of the forever abolition of slavery by Jean-Jacques Dessalines, made ofowu, in accordance with the Divine Order, Our God, Good God, One and Only. Humanity, the greatest Evil there is, seems unwilling to die. Like a wounded animal, for example, a lion in the forest, it proves infinitely dangerous. We certainly know this but where are the people, in other words, where are the peoples of the planet in the face of the repeated assaults of the age-old slave traders against the people, even in the era of Jean-Jacques Dessalines? They are all here, without lacking the Dessalinian fuel. However, something has happened that has fouled the very core of their being. We will identify it, or rather, expose it.

People Under the Venomous Claws of Man

We are witnessing the peak of horror. Before the people of Venezuela, setting aside all partisanship, there is Palestine, particularly Gaza. We are witnessing the joyous massacres, in the eyes of the white men, and the open takeover of the territory and the lives of the inhabitants—or so it is believed—by the same people, the slave traders and invaders of old, now known as the white men, an incurable and severe cancer of the earth. A small population of people, a coordinated effort from several countries, in short, from notorious criminal organizations, are massacring them with cataclysmic fury, just as they crushed the Black people on the Masuana continent in the very beginning. We cannot help but constantly relive this murderous rage in full swing; we know it all too well. It is the rage of the white men at its peak. Let us not make the mistake of believing that this is the affair of a single country, a small country, or a few brigands from a tiny nation. We are witnessing the concerted action of the “monster,” as the Invincible General and His Majesty the Eternal Emperor Jean-Jacques Dessalines so aptly described it in his reply to the French General Quentin in October 1802, in Saint-Marc. It is undeniably a mass of mass murderers scattered across a large part of the planet, as several critics speak of half a million victims, 75 to 80% of whom are women and children, out of a population of over a million. Their sole purpose is to kill people, these devourers of nations. What is certain is that the targeted territory is razed, as almost all the buildings are in ruins. It's a spectacle of the end of the world, brutally laid bare before our eyes. It's unbelievable. They, the white supremacists from every corner of the earth, are relentlessly attacking this small (numerically) group of people. They all contribute, without exception, it is said, in various ways, either by supplying weapons or by justifying the lethal operation. All the means they employ to achieve their ends surpass what they themselves call, by definition, common sense. When it comes to destruction, they do nothing by halves. Here again, it is a people, a group of individuals, individuals of any age, whom they are targeting. And the world seems to see nothing.

Sanctions as a Means of Destroying Peoples

To unleash their fury against mere municipal individuals, they don't always resort to weapons. Instead, they often use economic sanctions. Why this field specifically? It's because of its indispensable role in the way of life within the white system. We cannot do without it. Hinder this activity, and everyone, regardless of age, is severely affected, in every way. The economy is a weapon of mass destruction, in the truest sense of the word. Economic asphyxiation is as effective, perhaps more so, than conventional and modern weapons. It goes further than these, given the prolonged suffering, equivalent to torture, that it entails. There is no fixed form. It can be a simple headache, sometimes chronic, or it can be acute pain leading to certain death. Impoverishment, malnutrition, and famine—in short, mass death and economic collapse—are the primary intended effects. So there's no need to mention the developmental delays across all sectors. People have money, but they can't buy it; they have things to sell, but potential or actual buyers are prevented from purchasing them. They are left with their possessions, which are left to wither away. Economic sanctions, whatever form they take, target individuals, and ultimately entire populations, all to weaken them, drastically reduce their numbers, and, in the end, seize control. People from all countries and from nations different from their own are constantly affected. It is clear that this is a campaign of violence against the people.

All these countries or organizations, criminal though they may be, that resort to this infinitely sophisticated method, are those who, for the last five centuries, have relentlessly practiced, in one way or another, the conquest of difference, and consequently, enslavement, because one cannot coexist with the other. They are all the product of aggression, theft, rape, massacres, and so on. They all have experience with the annihilation of the other. It cannot be otherwise because it is a necessary element of their worldview. The objective is to plunge them below themselves and keep them there in order to then cast them into oblivion, according to the ideology of “enslavement,” in this case, white supremacy, which amounts to degrading or eliminating them en masse in order to elevate themselves.

From Individuals to Leaders

We are not dealing with just anything. This is a technique that is the product of reason, as they like to say, something well thought out, planned. What follows clearly reveals this. Indeed, the white supremacists are very aware of the cyclonic effect of their methods. They know it so well that they judge that the effects, without referring to the methods themselves that produce them, must be punished. It is as if they were shocked by it and were taking the side of the people. At first glance, it seems crazy, nonsensical. How, one might ask, can they turn against themselves after having inflicted such fates on these people? Let's be clear! What they say is not a about-face but the maintenance of the direction. They go even further into evil, which in their eyes is actually a proven good, because it is an imperative of their nature. Through what they say, they move from individuals to leaders, both men and women It's their turn to be done with the individuals. It's important to understand that the leaders are not the people they're targeting, but the individuals—in other words, the people. They hold them responsible for everything that happens to the individuals, for the problems they themselves create. They absolve themselves of all responsibility and shift it onto the leaders. By taking a stand against these leaders, the white supremacists present themselves as the defenders of the people, and therefore of the nations, at the expense of their authorities. This way, they can kill two birds with one stone: swallow up both the people and the authorities—rebellious, certainly—and replace them with their enslaved people, those who carry out their catastrophic will. The situation is extremely complex. It's called "what-morde-suffle." We obviously see this as cowardice for someone who claims to be the strongest. The strategy is simple but effective.

Mental Confusing

The monster presents itself as someone who has the interests of the people at heart, those whom it suffocates through economic aggression and on whom it seeks to drop its bombs. Consequently, it portrays their authorities as the monster, thus taking its place. To achieve this, it constructs a pre-established narrative against these people, a narrative, of course, completely at odds with reality. The destruction of local authority is crucial to gain direct access to the people in order to achieve its objective. Where friendly authorities begin to appear independent, the monster's behavior remains the same. It proceeds in this way even when it already has the leaders in its pocket, leaders who are only nominally so. Its strategy consists of plunging everyone into darkness to have the spotlight focused solely on itself. This is the blow dealt to Nigeria at the end of 2025. What must be understood is that white supremacy, or humanity itself, is not without torture, killing, and massacre. It is not without reason that Jean-Jacques Dessalines calls him the “monster.” One never gets used to it. He has no friends, only himself. He is conceived that way. The monster cannot abide the idea of ??an intermediary. He tolerates it, only for a time, where he has no other choice. He is made to dominate directly. He must be alone with himself. It is the only way to be with himself. This is the other side of his war! He uses this tactic to target leaders and destroy them along with the rest of the people in the territory. Those who are not skilled—something one develops through the exercise of the body's capabilities—and who, consequently, are prone to sentimentality, easily fall into the trap and exhibit the behavior that the natural enemy expects of them. There are so many distractions in the context of enslaved life that it is very easy to lose touch with oneself. This life is designed for that. These distractions, when they are not the result of miscalculations to extricate oneself from the rule of law, are traps deliberately set by men to confuse their adversaries. This allows for the artificial damage to the body's capabilities. The results of the blows dealt by the white supremacist strategy are harsh, but the strategy itself is simple. People are not fully present, not fully aware of themselves, because of economic aggression; as a result, they are easy to deceive, especially when situations are highly complex. You can tell them that X is responsible for their best efforts, and that can easily be accepted. We know the outcome.

Directing oneself, never relinquishing it for the benefit of another we have spoken of the people in the common sense of the term. This word conceals no enviable connection. Consequently, it is not a source of any protection between citizens. This explains why the use of the word “people” is so frequent. It portrays these individuals as abandoned, even within a community, a nation. In short, the people are not protectors. However, the use of the word “people” under the influence of Jean-Jacques Dessalines has a completely different meaning. It has a meaning contrary and contradictory to its popular usage. The same is true for the term “people.” The people, in the Dessalinian sense of the term, are people—this is certainly not tautological, because it is an extension of the word “people.” The two are interconnected. One calls forth the other. There is a people, according to the Dqmbala of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, Dqmbala in the sense of true knowledge, when individual communities unite around an element common to all, as beings, to each and every one. Such is the case of the Will of Full Unity which is at the heart of the choice of the Invincible General Jean-Jacques Dessalines, by the chiefs and groups of fighters of Artibonite, as the one who will drive the white settlers out of our territory after he drove them from the Fort of La Crête à Pierrot, in October 1802. All those involved formed a unity, a new one because, as members of the community, they were already a unity, centered around this Will.

It is this new unity that constitutes itself as the People. We are always within the Community Being. The People, in the Dessalinian sense of the term, is not an arbitrary creation. It is in itself an Ofowu Will because it reveals the Mbwa (generative element) of the Community Being to lead itself. Like all the constituent elements of the Communal Body, Gwqmunité is immutable and irreversible: “I have watched, fought, sometimes alone; and, if I have been fortunate enough to place in your hands the sacred Deposit you entrusted to me, remember that it is now up to you to preserve it.” Gwqmunité does not exist without commitment. Passivity has no place here. This is a field of action.

From what we have just seen, the word People implies unity, and Gwqmunité, self-government, in itself, by itself, and for itself. It is here that we see the great wisdom of Jean-Jacques Dessalines because, according to him, the people are a People-State, in the sense that they are made to govern themselves: “The people inhabiting the former island (...), agree here to form themselves into a free, sovereign, and independent State, free from all othe powers of the universe...”. The logic here is inescapable. Indeed, the People, being what they are, are in themselves a State. The act of “forming into a State” is the transition to action. It cannot therefore not “form itself into a State; this is its logical and ofowu destiny. The term “State” is inextricably linked to government, the act of self-governance. There is the government of Self at the first level and the government of Self at the level of Authority, which is responsible for ensuring the proper functioning of things, both internally and externally. The People-State has its own part or sphere in the art of self-governance. The People-State cannot exist without Authority. However, it does not dictate conduct. Conduct provides a way of being in the world; consequently, it violates the space reserved for the capacities of the Body, whose purpose is to experience itself in accordance with its substance of being. This sphere belongs to the People-State. The government of Authority listens, analyzes, decides, adjusts, reinforces, guides, and is accountable to the People-State. It follows that the People-State is active at all levels. This governmental axis highlights unity through interdependence, the Municipal Base, especially the body's capabilities, to carry out the work and the effective commitment of the Imperial Body in its journey towards Perfection, the highest point of the Being that we are. Among the white people, the slave owners However, elsewhere, following in the footsteps of whiteness, nothing is the same. It is a infantilized world. Intelligence, their superior capacity, is almost silenced. There, the starting point of so-called collective life, society, is self-renunciation, more precisely, the renunciation of one's right to self-governance, which encompasses a mass of things. From this void arises power, the element that directs the lives of others in their place. One is a people under the domination of power, therefore through citizenship, which is the seal of vassalage. People form a balloon from the power because no one is connected to anyone else. The appearance of unity among citizens is explained by submission to the same law without any possibility of transgression. This link is between the sovereign, the legislator, and the citizen, through their will transformed into law, not a link between them. The life of these elements is dictated conduct; this includes accepted thoughts and passions. Power is the Supreme Reason, and the reasons of the people are modes of adaptation to the Supreme Reason. It has the right of life and death over all citizens. This has no boundaries in the lives of each individual. It flows through them as if on the ocean. There is no Muc; they are, through representation, what they shamelessly call democracy, a denial of self. The system implies this constant attempt to divert the other from oneself through discourse and violence. It is a fundamental requirement of Slavery explains the utter insensitivity of the vast majority. It also explains their murderous nature. They are agents of the peak of cruelty. How, in such a situation, can one still raise their head, see others and see themselves? Impossible! They are in a position of hiding their heads but without knowing that they are delivered into danger, much like an ostrich.

The Absence of Remorse

This is a very serious matter. How can such a fact be explained, one might ask? There is nothing easier. White people are not beings in themselves; they are products of thought. They are the fruits of a miscalculation, a flawed understanding of themselves. Their development, always following this calculation, lies in praxis, in action, in the sense of bringing about the content of thought. They act under the impulse of their thoughts. They seize opportunities, following their thoughts. When the effect is positive, joy overwhelms them. This is normal; they see things through the prism of their thought-being. Every time they can act in this way, in the sense of becoming, they derive enormous joy from it. Remorse is the opposite. There is more. They cannot feel any remorse because these "common" beings, those they call different, even distinct—for example, Black men and women—are made for this, according to their understanding. They are convinced of it. Such is the verdict of their thinking. They believe themselves to be above all those who are not like them and are the divine staff. Let us remember the white supremacist ideology that makes Earthlings, and therefore Black men and women, beings of another species, with very limited superior abilities, an inferior species, even to animals. They are made, according to them, to suffer all kinds of harm at the hands of white people. In this category, there are not only Earthlings but also others, with the difference that these others are above them. They are equally capable of suffering; in other words, both sides can be struck in the same way, or at best, meet the same fate. A single desire consumes the white supremacists in this situation: success, and therefore the swiftest possible collapse of the opposing fortress before them. They, the white supremacists, resort to sensibility, particularly pain, to achieve their goal. This is far removed from Cartesianism. The people they destroy are not machines, they believe. Consequently, they can suffer. Their cries are different from those of machines, even if Cartesianism disagrees. The other side knows pain because they are sentient. The white supremacists use this capacity to their advantage. All the barking is aimed at achieving the desired result, which is to extinguish the collective singularities that constitute peoples. In other words, they force their way through, nothing more. What's important here is that they have the moral strength and the audacity to do it.

The Effect of Thought

Slave traders are morally strong, certainly, in their thinking; therefore, they kill with ease and coldness. They spend their time developing the means to achieve this. It's even a great honor for them to possess powerful means to massacre en masse and actually use them. They are pleased and proud of their ability to inflict mass death. They constantly reinforce their arsenal of death for the cause. It's not something that happens spontaneously... No, no! They are hardened criminals. They are not simply terrorists but Siamese twin terrorists, an unimaginable horror. However cruel it may be, it is a necessity. These genocidal organizations, these days, armed to the teeth for the cause. This climactic point, in addition to being a source of great pride for them, is, in their view, the sign of their much-revered superiority. They are not joking. This method of killing, of emptying the planet of its inhabitants of all kinds, is certainly essential to their objective. It is an imperative of their nature, permeating their thoughts, habits, and actions. They developed all of this under the authority of human thought, more precisely, human pathology, the residue. It is a virtuous act, engaging in the assassinations of people classified as different and distinct species; they find their greatest happiness in it. Even when they are not directly the assassin or the perpetrator of the crime, they proudly participate as members of the group, through community, a unifying element of the group, through its apogee, as well as through its unconditional pre-approval.

The lie

There is a method dear to the matter. Indeed, anyone who regularly reads the texts we publish from this perspective knows that, in political science, the principle of action is not skin color, as the white supremacists would have us believe, but thought. The thought that invents politics or the thought that founds political organization is called philosophical anthropology. Everything that finds its place within it or that is supported by it in everyday life is necessary and indispensable to it. Narrative, more precisely the mendacious narrative, is a characteristic of political thought. It is what is called, first and foremost, philosophical anthropology. On this subject, the Greek philosopher Plato constantly urges us to "Lie! Lie!" because he knows it's impossible to always rationally support what we assert and do, but that we must say and do it. His Greek successor, Aristotle, considered the founder of scientific logic, boldly overcomes every logical or theoretical impasse. Saying and doing are what matter, not the means. We don't concern ourselves with the impossible. This is, without a doubt, the limit of the mind, especially in this field. This is because philosophical anthropology, whatever one may think or say, is a construct, driven by its own self-interest, which is not always achievable. If lying is a possible solution, it must be used with ruthless detachment. That is the golden rule.

The Media as a Tool of Lies

If the necessary resources are available and success is assured, action is taken. There is no independent regulatory standard. The human world is inherently a void; it cannot be regulated in itself, except through the tendency to create an effective future, thus objectifying itself. We have seen this with white supremacy in other texts. However, some acts are so frightening, so disconcerting, even for men, that they may not go unchallenged, as the saying goes. In other words, they can backfire on their perpetrators. The world of men is not homogeneous. This world is one of pure and limitless force. They tear each other apart, kill each other, they live off Evil. A dirty trick that someone can easily pull off can nevertheless attract a sea of ??criticism if it brings about a success so desired by its perpetrator, in order to smear them and, if possible, cause them to lose their advantage. Thus, experience teaches us that discourse must be supported by consistency and facts. This is how the discipline that white supremacists today call journalism came about. History plays a significant role in its construction. They are very similar, except for the daily nature of journalism, which grants it a certain topicality.

The discipline, if we can call it that, has a binary foundation from the outset: one part is tied to a certain factuality—this is imposed by circumstances—and the other to opinion. The reason for the latter is to lie without scruple, to serve oneself properly. Journalism rests on opinion. In the first instance, it's not quite about the facts themselves; it only partially reports the facts, thus distorting them at the source to easily adapt them to opinion—that is, the so-called commentary. There's a third aspect to it: the act of saying it. It's the only part that's true, if you will. It relates to the rules of language. This isn't intentional; they twist a requirement to their advantage: to agree to say it carefully to make it appealing. In short, everything is false except the act of saying it, because it relies on grammar. Because of the objective of journalism, which is to lie or deceive, it cannot be an object of study. Because of what it aims for, we can associate a kind of perlocutionary force, namely, that it either succeeds or fails. This requires a certain skill, which is not something to be proud of.

The fact that journalism is not an object of study means it is neither a science nor an invention. Consequently, it does not generate any knowledge. Knowing how to lie, through learning various techniques, cannot be considered instruction. Speaking well is not journalism. It is a property of discourse, therefore accessible to everyone. It is independent of any science. Given the lack of instruction, or at best, of knowledge—which is not an insult; it is the discipline that fails to provide it; young people who might achieve wonders elsewhere are sacrificed on the altar of Evil—it is undeniably a crime against writing and speech because of its objective. I realized this very early on, after high school, specifically during my first semester or first year of studies at CEGEP, more precisely, in a creative writing course, because I was studying French Literature. Since then, I have observed journalistic accounts very closely, which has certainly allowed me to understand quite a lot.

At university, where I was pursuing my studies in French Literature, I gained access, through political philosophy, my second discipline, to the scientific rationale for the necessity of journalism in a world founded on the necessity of slavery. Even journalism students don't understand the game. Its usefulness rests on the obligation to overcome resistance to slavery. We saw, in another text, how literature, giving rise to whiteness, is presented to the world as a scientific discourse. Yet the scientific nature of this discourse is nil.

History as a Method of Assassination

As we emphasized earlier, history, even before journalism, had the primary objective of obfuscating the facts, and even inventing them, in order to lead thought astray. White supremacy also uses history, a discipline that is not a science either, to invent a narrative contrary to reality. Through history, they seek to thwart the inconvenient reality. We are still in the realm of enslavement. History is often the site of empty narratives that benefit humanity, particularly white supremacy. It is another story, but without real content. This content is utterly irrelevant. We finally discover what history is for. For example, to counter—which is impossible—the fact that, through Jean-Jacques Dessalines, our Ancestors affirm that, contrary to what white supremacy, and therefore man, claims, we are not “slaves,” that, through our benevolent capacity, we are forever putting an end to slavery and establishing the mode of being in the world proper to the Being that we are, whose name is, forevermore, the Empire of Haiti, a work like no other, whose objective is “to ensure the guarantee and security of citizens in an immutable and irrevocable manner,” the Letter of Appointment, January 25, 1804, white supremacy arrives with a history, from which the Muc, foundation of our Victorious Struggle, is expelled and replaced by its opposite, which is the “will to attain humanity,” that is to say, to submit to white supremacy by adopting its a way of being in the world through the defunct Republic of Haiti, an institution

—I don't know if we can define it as such—a slave-owning institution, in other words, the continuation of white slavery. The Frenchman, Jean-Pierre Le Glaunec, professor of Haitian history, we can say so, at the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec, Canada, a country to which white slavery had entrusted the permanent direction of the genocide in Haiti—the lethal logic, if there is one—, delivers the meaning of the true history of our ancestors to the advantage of white slavery by reworking it. He didn't think it himself; he adopted it for the good of white slavery. The idea being put forward is clear: France is the epitome of good, and simply joining it is enough to rise from a low, very low level to a high plane, as Sonthonax so aptly puts it: “to go from nothing to existence.” The Ancestors, according to Glaunec, that is to say, the “Blacks,” chose to “rise to humanity.” That changes everything. We are not seeking to cut ourselves off from France; on the contrary. Our goal is to follow in its footsteps. Thus, it is a failure to Independence. Slavery is presented as an acceptable way of life. Ancestry is an outdated stage of our existence. Our future is now in the shadow of our natural enemy. What lies behind this is the persistence of slavery; whiteness refuses to die.

The narrative of the distortion of Dessalinian history, circulated by white supremacists to dismantle the Muc (Muslim Unity Campaign), is not homogeneous. It is multifaceted and contradictory. It has become a state of affairs. Despite this cacophony, it is not impossible to extract its guiding thread. Without going further back in time. Through history, the slave owner seeks to murder in order to advance himself.

The accusation

Here we have a prime example of "history-for-nothing," to borrow the vocabulary of Karukeran, EDDY Léopold-Édouard DEHER-LESAINT-LESAINT. Discipline is not at fault, but rather the person who uses it to carry out terrorist acts and as a means of justifying white supremacist terrorism. This satanic game is accessible to everyone, regardless of their level of intelligence. Hence the danger of it! The book to consult to fully understand these matters:

HRH HIS MAJESTY PRINCE WEBER TIÉCOURA DESSALINES D’ORLÉANS CHARLES JEAN BAPTISTE

PRINCESS EUGENIA DESSALINES

AND HER HUSBAND D’ORLÉANS CHARLES:

THE CITY OF DESSALINES ANSWERS YOU:

HERE IS THE VICTORIOUS PRINCIPLE OF OUR STRUGGLE IN THIS WORLD

WITH THE COLLABORATION OF CINO CLYFORD AND CQ VIZION MUNAL

LOF EDITIONS

(LEKBA/OGU/FWEDA), 2020

Whitewashing the Press and Disinformation

We have just seen how whitewashing uses history, as a discipline, to undo people's very being in order to then comfortably settle into it. The history concocted by whiteness is the history of nothing at all. Whiteness as emptiness, in the sense of illusion, transforms everything into emptiness, just like himself. He is compelled to do so because, as a thinking being, he tends toward objectification. The problem, and it is no small matter, is that he cannot change reality. However, he holds the opposite view. Within him lies what is called the residue of human pathology, which, through its influence—also an illusion since it stems from the miscalculation at the root of humanity—constantly transmits to him a positive idea devoid of content. It makes him believe that this is possible and that it suffices to believe it and act accordingly. Through this residue, man, in this case, whiteness, believes that everything is permitted to him. He will do exactly everything in his power to give himself effective becoming. He has no feeling for acting in order to create himself, even if such is his principle.The obstacle is people because they insist on being themselves. This is the effect of a Mbwa of being, the Gwqmualité. This attitude is diametrically opposed to his project, at best, his inclination to become man, the dominant one. So he doesn't hesitate to destroy them, if necessary. That's what he's doing now. There are a multitude of ways, he believes, to break the other, especially, to torture him, take his life, and force-feed him a bad thought of himself, which thought would incline him, if it takes root in him like a plant that is put in the ground, to go against himself without him realizing it, that is to say, in the direction of whiteness. It's a lethal game; you serve only one purpose. In other words, either you submit to him, or he kills you physically if you resist him. Don't think that you have a chance, a chance, to live, caught between the two. Think again! If you let yourself be dominated by him, he'll tear you apart. This means you're no longer a being in the full sense of the word because you're dominated, a third-class being. You'll spend your whole life fighting against this. Yet you live in your own home. The problem is, your home is no longer your home; in other words, you don't have a home. It follows that you're no longer a being like everyone else, that is, like him. A dependent being is, by definition, "enslaved." It's something mental, certainly, but the weight of the mind in real life is heavy, very heavy. "Enslaved" or "slave"—that's his word to define the non-self—has no reality, it's just hot air. The void, by clinging to you, prevents you from possessing anything because you do not possess yourself. Such is the situation of the "slave" or the "enslaved," in the eyes ofman, the illusory being. It is the self that grants possession. You no longer have it. Such is the logic of the system. In conclusion, you are dead, dead because you are no longer the original being. In life, you must remain true to yourself. You are made to be within yourself, to lead yourself, and you are equipped with all the necessary capacities for this great journey of life. If you only knew how pleased I am with myself! I have lived more than two-thirds of my life among the natural enemy of my being, and I have never wavered. If you could see the number of blows they tried unsuccessfully to strike me because I am ME, a worthy son of my Ancestors. My publications and lectures bear witness to this. He's furious. Nothing and no one can expel me from myself. The most beautiful life is to be with oneself.

Deserting you inevitably leads to the state to which you are reduced, a state that, for the vast majority of people like you, is synonymous with misery—what we call malcity, a induced dispossession. You are enslaved, reduced to the state of the ideology of the “slave.” The other possibility is physical death, the land without a hat, as they say, in our ancestral way of life. For all this to happen, whiteness first passes through narrative, a negative discourse, a situation that displeases or revolts, and another positive aspect, that is, the way to correct the situation, which is to imitate it. It returns, in a way, with the model of history. Hence journalism! It's insane!

The Media

Men, primarily white men, invented a narrative mode called the media, a name chosen arbitrarily because of its role in supporting this mendacious and harmful narrative. It encompasses traditional media, mainstream media, corporate media, and so on, to justify the reign of extreme cruelty they have established over individuals, groups, and nations. In some cases, they remain silent. This is another way of lying. They give the impression that nothing is happening and that everything is proceeding as normal. By concealing what is happening, they are hiding something of great importance to you. Thus, they do not raise the alarm. It is precisely at this time that they speak. According to their code, to say nothing is to speak, and speak loudly. These media outlets are tasked with smoothly conveying the unforgivable, the unacceptable, and they play their role very well. They shrink from no planned carnage. They fervently endure the horror, before, during, and after the thing. They present horror as salvation, fully aware of what they are doing. The historians, like the Karukeran, Eddy Léopold-Eduard Deher-Lesaint, likes to call them, also belong to this category. They know very well what they are doing. These cold narrators, these cold female narrators, carry the deadly narrative with a clear conscience and they bring about its realization. They are murderers. They are very proud of it. They will happily throw at your feet, evil, famine, nuclear war, etc., all with a smile on their lips. They were cut from the same cloth as you. We are not dealing with ordinary people. What we have just seen applies to all the peoples of the planet, except for white supremacy, since it is the author of this disgraceful maneuver, with this difference, and it is enormous: they have never known the horror to which we are subjected. We share the following with everyone else. First, let us remember this. White supremacists start from the idea that what belongs to God, what is their own, belongs to them. Moreover, this is the reason for this mental construct of theirs. Otherwise, they would have no need for it. They make the false god, the god of thought, the creator and possessor of all things, which amounts to saying that they are essentially what their god is. What must be understood here is that God and they are one. It follows that you and what should be yours belong to them through this deceit. You have no rights because you don't even own yourself, according to their destructive logic. You are an illusion. That's how they see you. This understanding of things is what makes us human. The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, father of the philosophical anthropology of natural law, defines man as an individual, “he who has a right to all things, including the bodies of others,” he says. This is the natural right of man that the government has the mission to fulfill. Don't be fooled, because democracy, which is the delegation of one's rights to someone other than oneself to represent oneself, is the instrument of this. Politics is a trap, a dead end.

What you must understand here is that power is the enemy of every human being. It is there to absorb you in order to create you as submissive. He thinks for you and acts for you, an undeniable dispossession of yourself. The space he leaves you is to carry out his orders, to fulfill himself through you. He does not accept disobedience. He leaves you this small corner of yourself because there is no way for him to seize it. Why? If you can say, "No!" It is not a gift from him. You are endowed with willpower. This Mbwa, he cannot seize or annihilate it. However, his art lies in influencing it in order to absorb you. Politics is a game of death. See my work on this subject:

THE RAZOR PRINCE III

His Majesty Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines D’Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste

THE SKELETON MAN OF THE ARTIFICIAL ORDER OF LAW

VOLUNTARY ENSLAVEMENT BY TRAP

Collection:

In the Name of the Princess

Atala Dessalines D’Orléans

Fleur des Champs

Volume VIII

LOF Editions

LEKBA/OGU/FWEDA, 2020

The People and the Weakness of Peoples

“The People” is the key concept of the Dessalinian movement, encompassing all the operations leading to the cleansing of our existential sphere and the Erection of the Eternal Empire of AYITI. It is an amalgam and is designed to be the origin of everything necessary to persevere in the Self. It is the brain and the arm of each and every one of us. “The People form themselves into a State,” that is the logical consequence. “The People” and “the State” are two great institutions of existence, of life in harmony with oneself. The nuance between the two is phenomenal. First of all “the People” is in itself, it is not a product of consensus but spontaneously of the Will to be in oneself, the reason for resorting to Jean Jacques Dessalines for the recovery of Crête from Pierrot to entrust him with the mandate to unhinder Gwqmunity, his Gwqmunity, a Mbwa of his unit. Through this specific act, “the People” is instantly constituted, a unity of mun, whose basic Will is the Will to be in oneself, the very one that generated it. “The People” is massive, it is the totality of people engaged in the process of aeration of the Gwqmunity by asking Jean Jacques Dessalines to take charge of it. “The People” have their Essence or the same Essence as them. He is their extension of themselves, the Muc. He responds to the requirements of his Essence, which are “by himself”, “for himself” and in himself. For this he “forms himself into a State”, then from the impetus to the act. The impetus is “the People” and the act is “the State”, which was implied in the impetus, namely “the People”. “The State” is the government of the “People” in themselves, by themselves and for themselves, according to its Essence, what is in itself. “The State” is because there is the “People”, as an institution which precedes it. To put it another way, “the State” is a consequence of “the People”. They are made for each other by a unity of elements specific to the munal or mun as means of response. So there is no need for withdrawal to start from the singular municipal to arrive at the “People” and end up with the “State”. What a Great Scholar, this Jean Jacques Dessalines, the son raised by Agbahaya Toya! To what is happening around, an opposition consummate and displayed by the Eternal Victor of whiteism, Jean Jacques Dessalines!

Everything we have just seen is not history but science, political philosophy. This is then the scientific explanation of a fact. In the world around us, the white world and others that resemble it, a world of staggering disorder, the people are not in themselves. It is people by the submission of people, at best, their abandonment to the sovereign, or power, which sees the light of day in the renunciation of people to lead themselves, then in the stripping of themselves since the whole being in itself is indissolubly linked to this or these rights. What a trap! And it continues. The sovereign, figure of power and beneficiary of everything, is the birthplace of the people. Let's understand! The “individuals”, through withdrawal, have lost this which makes a being, of our order, a being, properly speaking. To continue to be now, he can only rely on another, full of himself. Who could it be? Without a doubt, the beneficiary, then the power. The sovereign is therefore the subject, the only subject. Those deprived of the fundamental benefit from the status of a people through their dependence on the sovereign, power. Let's call things what they are, a bond of vassalage. In this case the people are a set of “individuals” without their own “I”. By definition he undergoes. The people are in this sense a unity between the stack of “individuals” and the sovereign, not between people. This void is essential to politics. This is not the place to talk about it here. Let us simply say that the disparate state of the state of nature must remain as a protection for the sovereign. This void in the middle contributes to the strength of power. Without links between them, citizens cannot work together. Besides, there is no set. They are totally dependent on power. The game is well calculated. This leads to an excessive legalization of inter-citizen relations in which the strength of power crystallizes at the expense of the people. Theoretically any bad blow against the sovereign, in the event of dissatisfaction, is thus defeated. So citizens will always need the strength of the sovereign to protect themselves against themselves. We are dependent on society, permanent insecurity. Their bond as a people consists of complying with the demands of the sovereign. This is their protector and, therefore, their strength. Their submission to the sovereign, to enjoy his prerogatives, must be total. It involves whipping and death, they have to accept everything. The sovereign, through his agents, punishes even in the absence of an offense. To do this, he invents. We must constantly brandish the threat of a penitentiary to keep fear alive. It's exhausting! Everything can capsize. However there is a pre-established narrative to protect the system. What establishes it and threatens it with Dismissal presents itself as its spearhead, the stripping of “individuals” of their substance to replace it with an artificial one. It is to serve of the disease as a remedy, in other words, we constantly renew the system of representation, at best, of renunciation. It is a way of divert attention towards him, the citizen. The state can collapse at any time and it knows it. Hence the constant increase in the intensity of violence! Here it iswhy there is no good relationship between the people and the State! Force and bluff are the practical basis of the political system.

On the one hand, the State does not trust its people because they are always ready, it believes, to disobey; on the other, the people doubt the sincerity of the State because it is always ready, because it feels powerful, to censor and mistreat. This means that it is not difficult to pit one against the other, especially when you are in a position of strength. Strength seduces with ease. This is the situation in which the peoples of the world find themselves, a world where conquest is more necessary than ever.

The incessant conquest

Since the world of rights, both natural and artificial, is a prey situation, conquest is permanent. Let us not forget that citizens are not linked to each other. The reason for this is “individual” activities which are a field of struggles, supported by freedom, one of the human rights. The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, gives his justification. According to him, the world of nations is equivalent to the state of nature; every nation has a right over all others. Nothing and no one can remove this belief from the minds of the slaveholders. They are made up of this element. This explains the behavior of European nations yesterday, March 25, 2026, at the UN. Indeed, a Negro-Gelefween country, Ghana, submitted a resolution yesterday with regard to “slavery” against the Ancestors. The text clearly states that this “is the greatest crime against humanity”. There were three countries that voted against, the United States of America, Israel and Argentina, 52 European countries abstained and 123 countries supported the resolution. The vote is relayed by Dany Scorpio, this is very useful: “Understand what happened yesterday 03/25/2026 at the UN”:

https://youtu.be/jKn5VxATNgk?si=Hv9UyH_L46jCyUpK

The countries that voted against and those that abstained are the greenest slavers of the planet. They cannot accuse their behavior because they are woven from slavery thinking. This is their substance. They cannot deny themselves. These countries are also the greatest defenders of the Hobbian political doctrine. The French declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen states: The government is established to guarantee to man the enjoyment of his natural and imprescriptible rights. Article 2 “The declaration of the United States of America affirms the same thing. Let us ask ourselves the following question: What are these rights? They are the same as the English philosopher formulated in the seventeenth century. The natural rights of man are unlimited. In society they are not limited but supervised, that is to say how to enjoy them without harming others in the exercise of theirs. This is equality. The scope of what the law can bring as a benefit, through its exercise, within the societal framework is endless, for example, a citizen can, through liberalism, seize all the goods and resources of his society and becomes, as a result, the one who holds national sovereignty and, consequently, the leader of all citizens who are, by the very fact, already infantilized and vassalized. If this nation, through conquest, manages to subjugate all others, the holder or holder of sovereignty, through the exercise of his rights, accomplishes the fullness of the natural rights of man, according to the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, the Englishman, by possessing all things effectively, by putting into practice the new mode of government, favoring the possession of all things by the new modality of politics. This is why the European slave countries are not voting for the Negro-Gelefwenne resolution, carried by Ghana. They don't have no intention of giving up on themselves. So slavery continues. So peace on earth is not tomorrow.

There is one thing that we have deliberately not said, namely that we are in a state of slavery, that the people, in the eyes of the States, do not count and that only the State has value. For what ? Because the State owns the people. So it is not really the state of peoples but the state of States. And that is not false! The strongest state, which is the equal of the strongest “individual”, in the methodical state of nature of political philosophy Hobbian, is the one who has a force of mass destruction. He features Joanice as a woodland assassin. This is what the world of States is, in fact. He steals, rapes, kills, murders, massacres, genocide, etc. He conquers as much of States as circumstances permit. A state can have its feet rooted in several continents and its power over people who are not at all like its people. By this we must understand that he comes into possession of a territory with all the people, therefore the people, which is not his and that he dictates policy without regard to the citizens, who are not in his eyes. Whether people strike is none of his business. When another state starts to growl at it, it drops the people on its ass, the people it represents. The antinomy between the people and the State works in its favor. He can easily manipulate it through the harmful narrative, carried by the media, the murderers as much as the slaver. Given the state of relations between the two, the people and the State, this has every chance of working, unless these people have been able to develop a sort of armor against slavery.

The blow of the slaver dealt to the people outside by the people

Let's follow him! The slave conqueror from outside positions himself behind the people whom he tramples and dispossesses, going over the head of his State, his government. He presents himself as her one and only savior. The oppressor poses as his defender against the internal State. The conqueror does not intend to remain at the level of discourse, he takes sanctions against the government, he says. However, sanctions are means of preventing it from meeting the expectations or some expectations of the people. Let’s understand what’s at stake here! A government which has a nationalist bent, in other words, which is opposed, even if only a little, to the slaveholder seizing all the wealth of the country without leave nothing to the people living in the territory, is sanctioned, that is to say deprive yourself of the means to carry out your project, therefore give a little bit to the people. The question that must be asked now, is there a properly governmental activity in the sense that only relates exclusively to the government, without the people having anything to do with it? The answer is definitely no. There is the country and the people, the two are one entity. What we must learn from this is that the sanctions hit them, the common people, hard. But it’s against the government, he said. The slaver asserts loud and clear that he takes a stand for the people and necessarily the country, he who plunders everything. It has to be done.

Let's take a closer look at the measures taken against the supposed government! The first sanctions aim at economic asphyxiation. The State is prohibited from selling any product that facilitates the entry of currency into the country and from purchasing any product that is used to develop the means necessary for the production of services to citizens. The government cannot make any transaction, of any nature whatsoever, in favor of its ability to meet the needs of any order of citizens. It pushes the national currency into collapse to drive up the cost of living in the country so much that people can no longer consume. It prohibits other countries from trading economically with this country under penalty of severe sanctions. Companies cannot sell or buy abroad. In short, the sanctions are intended to cause massive suffering to the population. It's not just that. Indeed, a wave of violence will sweep across the country, in every corner of the country. The violence is carried out by two groups of people, the locals, locals, and the foreigners, foreigners. Yes, they arm local people to destabilize by raping, stealing and pillaging, and furiously sowing death; they also introduce foreign elements into the country to provoke unrest such as massacres. Insecurity is taking over the country in a dizzying manner. Everything is messy. Nothing is the same anymore. The country becomes a memory, we experience it, even when we are there, in the image of the past. We are forced into exile, a death drive, without knowing it, because we are already there in our heads, on our soil.

The people reach the highest point of destabilization through collapse economic damage caused by the slave trade and it is, therefore, very vulnerable. Finally, the time has come to show him the evildoer, his predator, then the State, his State, not the subject of the action, the slaver. The slave trader, frozen, accuses the government at every turn and, full of audacity, displays his support for the people, victims of his so-called State. Yet all these measures only hit the people making up the people, the world of very embarrassing “individuals” whom it proudly tramples on, mistreats and destroys. He is there and expects the people, which in their eyes is the multitude because they lack the capacity to organize themselves because of their “slave” nature, therefore idiot, to rise up against the government, the traitor in their eyes. When the government walked hand in hand with him, he benefited from all the art of governing. He gave her everything that mattered. The government only takes away a share for the benefit of the people. He gets angry about it. The slaveholder is profoundly anti-people, in both directions, now, with the sanctions, and before, when, according to him, things were going well. In short, it’s the people he doesn’t like, especially these days. His status is and remains the same, that is to say the “natural slave”, but he is of no use, without work in the fields and at home, except to consume goods to which he has no right, always according to the slave owner. This is why he has no scruples about subjecting him to the greatest deprivations that could lead to violence and death. This is his wish, which comes from deep within himself. We are not dealing with municipal beings, strictly speaking, but with monsters of an exceptional, unprecedented kind, due to the humanity that inhabits them.

The slaveholder cultivates the same feeling towards the government because of his belonging to the People. Delivering one or the other to the violence of the other does not make him hot or cold. Moreover, the government, according to him, deserves it doubly because it has sinned against naturalness since it dared to challenge it through its idea of ??giving, to the people, a small share of what belongs to them, the slaveholder, gods of man.

The use of mainstream media

No! it's not over. We need to shape perception more deeply. This is where the traditional media, particularly Western-Christian, enter the scene. This death game, better than any other, highlights the fundamental trait of the being of the so-called general public media, of beings who are hard of heart deep down, of the poisoners of the mind and of the great evils of the earth, in short, of the murderers. Discipline was invented to do this, kill, first, those who aspire to become journalists, then, through the victims, the public seeking information. Lethal Weapon is a pre-written narrative, with no connection to what is happening. They echo the slaver, therefore the gravedigger of “individuals”, in the Hobbian sense of the term. In their narrative the slaver is cast in the shadows, at best in dense obscurity, he is the author of nothing that hinders the life of the people. He does not bear responsibility for the very significant economic sanctions which paralyze the activities of the People and which lead to death. He is spared from the journalistic narrative. They avoid anything that would harm the smooth running of the master's work. The burden of responsibility falls instead on the State, either for mismanagement or for labeling its regime as a dictatorship, without us knowing very well what that is. Where the face of the slaver appears, the born killer, it is on the other page, like the announced savior. So these media have a clear awareness of their profession. Everything is said except what happens in reality. They increase like turning the knife in the pleasure. They are doing their job, they say. They certainly do not lie but kill information with a view to the certain death of the people. They are, of course, not conscious from the municipal point of view, because their being has gone off the rails, but they are, without a doubt, professionally conscious. They are present in what they do. They will not stage anything that goes against the line to follow. The authorities, the death media claim, are not accomplishing their task, they are killing their people. The accusation is final. They take up the discourse of the slave owner in its entirety, which discourse accuses the authorities. Besides, that’s what the work is all about. These journalists do not have a contrary point of view. They only speak to justify the death that the slaver sows, indiscriminately and indiscriminately. The people have a voice now, it comes from abroad, from death. Everywhere on earth there is one word. They take advantage of the difficult relations between the people and the State.

The drowning of people

The media speak with one accord and they speak loudly. They are everywhere so people, especially the people concerned, massively receive the same message. A few opposing voices are raised here and there but without comparable effect. This is the game. Retention capacity preserves what is massive. Then the voice of the mediators of death drowns them, these contrary voices. So many people end up having their thoughts blurred by their voices. of death, the traditional media. Many people will not go so far as to side with their own death, with the slaver, but they are stunned. Meanwhile the voice of the greatest Evil on earth, the slaver, follows its course. The media of the greatest evil on the planet are, without doubt, one of the greatest evils on earth.

The bad situation of the people is uncomfortable but that of the people, the singular and singular, therefore each and every one, is very uncomfortable because they are the ones who are plucked.

The peoples of the earth, as people, in danger of death

Everything we have just seen relates that all the peoples of the planet, as people, are a negligible quantity. It has been thus since the advent of man, a mental being, a tendency to dominate all others, which tendency implies the refusal to allow oneself to be subjugated by others. This is not the place to discuss the arrival of man on our planet. Let us be content to know that he is the source of all our evils and that what we are currently witnessing is the structure of his being, which is a mental illusion. The anthropology of natural law is the product of man, although he is a void, a being of thought, thought gives birth to other thoughts. Thought leads to other thoughts, especially to objectify oneself. It is in this framework that the anthropology of natural law is the fruit of man, a spiritual, that is to say mental, entity. This self-conception reduces “individuals” to nothing, consequently people facing the State and States as vassals of those who are powerful. There is a union of States against people, and the “individual” in particular. The relationship between States is not our object but that of the peoples among themselves. If people do not withdraw into themselves, they will certainly disappear under the destructive effect of the slave trade.

A matter of people, only of people

What is said above highlights the mode of governance on earth, a mode that, through death, man wants to impose, more precisely, man of the natural rights of man, on a planetary scale. Governance happens between governments to the detriment of people, ultimately people, all people. People are in danger of disappearing. The death gods no longer need them like they used to. “Slaves” were used to be dominated and work in the fields, at home, etc. Today the slavers have their machines. It takes very few people to give glory to the owners, to return them, like the reflection of a mirror, to their glory, for...., etc., etc., etc. They have their peers to measure themselves against. Hence the extreme uselessness of people! There is no way to reverse, through this mode of governance, the situation to the advantage of people, of peoples. Faced with other peoples, people are blind or almost. The situation almost got the better of them. What happens between peoples happens, first of all, between the singular and itself, the singular and itself. People are affected on all sides. In addition to this, from experience, man believes that this path would allow him to get there, at best, to achieve his objective. So people, therefore people, face imminent extermination if they remain in this situation. We cannot allow this to happen. People immediately need protection. We must unconditionally come to their aid. Any people attacked by slavers expect immediate help. Let each people make their emergencies known!

The Order of Peoples

1) - Our God, Good-God, GwqmrtLa, Matmaangala, Nanabuluku, etc., Is because We Are.

2) - Slavery, even if it was not central to our world, despite the very early arrival of humanity, its foundation, is forever abolished,

even if the same nations are there and remain hard pressed. The proof was once again given on March 25, 2026 at the United Nations Assembly, gathered at the request of Ghana.

3) - Any group of municipal individuals is obliged, by their body and pressured by the context, to form a people to protect themselves. It is not the word people as we understood it before. The semantics are new.

4) - The model of a suitable people is the one designed by Jean Jacques Dessalines because of the unfailing respect for the omunon¼ity of the Munal Self. By this construction, everything is centered on what we are, then Us, more precisely, the Muc.

5) - As the formation of the People revolves around the Mbwa of Gwqmunity, leading oneself, the act of constituting oneself as a People necessarily leads to the State, the actualization of governance by the People. The name is People-State. This is the new conception, a production of the Self by the Self, then a reproduction of itself by itself.

6) - The formation of the People-State calls for the Authority, the bearer of the forces of the State, whose task is twofold: 1) - Speak to the outside following the objective of the People-State, set by the People-State, in the global sense of the term, that is to say including the Authority as part of the People-State 2) - take charge of the interests of the People-State, concerns shaped by the People-State in its components badrales, members of the People-State, because each mun, once integrated into the People, then the People-State, becomes Badr, formerly called citizen, citizen, corrupt terms.

7) - Every power is Gwqmun facing every other power of The, the universe considered in the relationships of Things with themselves, with others and Our God, Good God.

8) - So the distance between People and Authority is over! Here we have a unity, necessarily speaking with one and the same Voice. It is not the authority which is defined from the outside, from external relations which in no way carry the power concerned in its vision of the world, except as nothing, for example the rule of law.

9) - From there any influence from outside is impossible. The People-State is and remains in itself, hermetically closed and in complete security:

a) - No hostile State is authorized to set foot on the soil of the People-State; the ground is exclusively his and he reigns there ALONE as Master;

b) - the waters as well as the sky of the People-State cannot be violated, whatever the conditions. This even applies to projectiles.

c) - Any People-State, through its people and its objects, can, without hindrance, circulate in international waters and airspace because no State exercises authority.

d) - Any member of a People-State enjoys, internally, unfailing security against any other People-State and any savqn people, slaveholders, any other jurisdiction. He is untouchable.

E) - It is the same for international waters and airspace because there is no authority and it is reserved for all without distinction. Traffic is barrier-free.

F) - Protection in all and unconditionally, etc., etc., etc.

g) - Any violation is punished severely. Vindictiveness is to be determined by the People-State in all its components.

10) - Consequently, there is an immediate need to trample on empty designations such as “gods or god”, “man”, “individual-man”, “law”, “right of nature” or “natural law” or “natural right of man”, “rule of law”, “democracy” and/or representation”, “nation”, “sovereignty”, “dictatorship”,

“economy”, “happiness”, “comfort”, etc., it’s all bullshit. Government by representation is a smokescreen for the benefit of the complexity of the scam. This order is obsolete.

11) - We must be careful not to fall into the trap of multipolarity. It is not a profound transformation of the mechanisms of relations between peoples because the basic element remains the natural right of man. It simply helps to get rid of the sensitive part of the non-slavery binary, structural dependence. It does not transcend this because of the complexity of the system. What binary represents is the tip of the Iceberg. This part shows the principal who dictates the rules and for whom, he believes, the other is. What is below the emerged part and which is irrevocably linked to it also dictates the standards but without the rigidity of the tip because the objective is not identical. This world, whatever form it takes, is a monster. What multipolarity offers, to begin with, is autonomy, not independence, from the system of domination. In this autonomy, there is no slaver who directly dictates the rules, who hunts and replaces, who punishes, kills, assassinates and who seizes all goods and resources, under the current mode. However, multipolarity, because it arises from human rights, centers “the individual”, therefore the nation which results from it, on itself, which does not go without pulling the cover on its side, then a relationship of domination at the level of interests, to ensure its supplies. The Iceberg, minus the emerged part, is made of these points, certainly less savqn (systemic savagery) because of the absence of the so-called character of vassals applied to others in relation to the slaver. However, through economics we can enslave a other. Enslavement and the economy are inseparable. It is not designed to benefit everyone, internally or externally. The Iceberg, the non-sensitive part, is a spider's web, any fly that lands on it is caught. We have to get out there. It is not made for the opponents of slavery, beings who hold irrevocably to their Gwqmunity, their omunon¼. This is what the People-State system offers!

12) - There is one thing, just one thing, that matters here: The MUC, The MUC alone, what the People-State is. We must regain control of ourselves, first, as a singular community, then, as a People, arising from the will of being in oneself and the decision-making to achieve it. This is the necessary prerequisite. What form will it take, the Muc, in the sensible world? This is in your hands. This is what is called being Gwqmun. Let's follow the line carefully so that it leads to the People-State, Healthy Place!

13) - Now is the time for repositioning and setting up new internal cooperation mechanisms, first, then external, then, according to the definition of Self. Everything that relates to the old system is void and pure violence, for example, consensus and universal consensus, therefore it has nothing to do with the new reality, the discovery of yourself, the Self. It follows that the old alliances, the debts, the contracts, the..., all this collapsed the moment you made the decision to be in yourself. They don't concern you. Everything is in the past. You undoubtedly shine with cleanliness because you are all you.

14) - By regaining control of your being, your Life, you regain possession of everything that is on your respective territory, all the goods and resources that have always been yours. The exploiters before had robbed everything, they are now obliged to pay you for everything, a hundredfold.

15) - You do not contract anything but exchange where possible.

16) - Trade is free, i.e. take and pay with your money or goods.

17) - You stay away from any international organization. It protects against nothing and represents a major obstacle to Gwqmunity, the expression of what you are in action. It is the assassins who dictate the rules in these institutions, which rules arise from empty thoughts, which gave birth to the horror called man, the greatest Evil of all.

18) - No external law has any effect within your territory. It is only a lethal trap for you but a great opportunity for men of natural human rights. Everything you need to persevere in the MUC is rooted in you, for the good of the People that you are. Ask yourself when you want to know what to do, what is good for you! It's all there, in you!

19) - Any delinquent nation, by the transgression of the laws it gives itself, for example, a member of an international organization, is a rogue nation and, consequently, it is not to be approached.

Your environment

20) - The mere fact of being what you are today and the necessarily positive feeling that emanates from it already creates, without contracting anything, an irreversible informal coalition. This is your environment, it is made up of People-States like you. The coalition of People-States is always ready, through its own drive for perpetuation, to stand up against any rogue nation, any attack against one of the People-States, an attack which would undoubtedly come from the slave owner, to thwart it.

21) - We are in the era of Jean Jacques Dessalines and the era of Jean Jacques Dessalines is, first and foremost, that of the municipal singulars and, then, necessarily those of the People-States. Everyone thinks for themselves and acts for themselves, the same goes for People-States because they are its extension.

22) - You yourself produce your exterior being, your way of being in the sensible world, according to the model of your Substance, your interior Being. Everything is there, you just need to take the time to read within yourself or listen to yourself internally. You are your one and only compass. This is an imperative of your Being. On this subject, you have the model of Jean Jacques Dessalines, the Eternal Emperor of the Empire of AYITI.

23) - Be careful not to let yourself be approached by white people. These are people you don't want to mix with, people from the Lousy Islands, who only live off predation, particularly on living things, on goods and resources and on inhabited or uninhabited spaces. They are the biggest disasters on the planet. They are not wanderers and wanderers. No, they form a system, which we can also call an order, of a cataclysmic nature based on human pathology, the principle of disaster reigning on the earth, called kokcn hcn dewqjmq. What we must understand is that whiteness is a born killer, in every sense, with unprecedented ferocity and ruthlessness. The white order, according to the structure of human pathology itself, is based on slavery. This is what he ultimately aims for. The whole meaning of life, according to their conception of it, resides there. Nothing happens by chance. An implacable logic cements the whiteist order. A handshake, a greeting, a smile, etc., everything relates to it and is therefore poisoned. Through order, the whiteists seek to bring about their idea of ??man. They claim the essence of this name. There is nothing surprising in this, man is a thought and thought tends to actualize where it is given as an integral part of reality. Without going into details, the pragmatic models of slavery, in particular, the economy, financial relations, technology, democracy, the rule of law, the military-industrial complex, the information system, energy agreements, cybernetic operations, comfort, dictatorship, etc., which compose it are means of absorption that the assassinators, the agents of violent death from all angles, then the whiteists, give themselves to achieve their objectification. Their actual structure is ruthless, it devours, with rage and contempt, its prey, the elements, theoretically, in the position of subordinates. They practice Loperie, cascading production, either direct or indirect, reasons that are not supported by reality, to tear their prey to pieces. For example, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, in a joint statement, blamed Iran for its strikes against the United States. This seems incomprehensible to normal people because they condemn the attacked, then the victim, who defends himself against the aggression, an aggression assumed by the aggressor. In the same context, France, through its General Quentin, accuses the Invincible General Jean Jacques Dessalines of aggression, who goes on the counter-offensive. The Invincible responds to him: “The French are watches that the earth swallows up too slowly.” Let's continue! Still within the framework of Louperie, the mainstream media prove to be real assassins. The narratives are made up of a bunch of lies to distract attention from reality in order to make the victim appear to be the aggressor. This is Louperie. They have a variable geometry conception of life. Assassinators are the epicenter of the great evil on the planet. Anything that comes from whiteness is lethal. They themselves, the whiteists, are products of Evil, humanity, the principle of man, of which they claim exclusivity. They have no limits, except to act for oneself, that is to say for the benefit of oneself, the residue of which - see human pathology on this subject - is the desire for desire. What must be constantly kept in mind, slavery is a project. For whiteists, it is the only project and implies the meaning of life. The challenge is to rise to it. To get there, and this is the explanation of what we are witnessing, we must go through fire, or generously sow suffering through the peak of horror. It follows that horror, in their view, is not conceived as evil but as good. Which is entirely logical because in the absence of horror the project is in vain. It is therefore imperative to want it, horror. Horror is not an evil in itself. The harm is not to resort to it. This is what explains the white order, and the carelessness of the major media in particular. They are all convinced that they are doing well. It's not ignorance, they know very well what they are doing. Their being is upside down. Their gods are the greatest value and are, unabashedly, the epicenter of horror. They must resemble him in every way. We must therefore stay away from white people, unconditionally.

24) - The mode of government based on the whiteist founding discourse is incompatible with regaining control of your life. It is problematic in all its forms. Therefore it is imperative to push it out of your municipal field. In other words it is unsuitable for the consciousness of being which is yours today.

To remember

25) - To be in life is to be in oneself by the Mbwa of Our God, Good-God, called GwqmrtLa, Matmaangala, Nanabuluku, etc.

26) - Through their body one cannot dissociate itself from the other, in other words, one is the continuity of the other. It follows that we cannot be placeless. This is us and, therefore, fully ours. He is Life and that by which Life, notably ours, is organized to preserve itself. The Indestructibility of Life, which characterizes Our God, is the expression of what we are, in the sense that we cannot not be what we are.

27) - Anyone who claims to want to replace our Life or takes actions in this direction, that is to say to take control of the People-State, then our Life, and of our goods and resources, even if it is impossible to achieve this because what is necessarily follows its trajectory, it is in this very that its etrality consists, openly defies the Divine Order in which We Are, which is Our Divinity, and, by the same token, the Dam Alaw¼nbadr, that is to say all inclusive, valid for all People-States, of His Eternal Majesty Emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines, namely, “The people inhabiting the island previously called Saint-Domingue, agree here to form themselves into a free State, sovereign and independent of any other power in the universe, …” and “Slavery is forever abolished”, the pure expression of the Indestructibility of Life. Life has no complexion and is in itself. This one or that one, regardless of where he or she speaks and acts, instantly falls under the law and its merciless consequences.

28) - The simple act of threatening to remove or assassinate the authority of another power to seize the Lives of the people - whether they are a People-State or not -, as well as their property and resources is an act of slavery and this immediately calls for indictment for terrorism and slavery, a crime against Busa.

29) - Failing to assassinate or actually assassinate, by any means, directly or indirectly, a leader of another power, for whatever reason, is a terrorist and slavery act, the law applies automatically.

30) - Supporting or supporting a terrorist act such as an act of slavery is like acting alongside the other. You are guilty in the same way as him and you will suffer the same fate.

31) - Anyone, whatever their function, orders the kidnapping of a member of another people, at home or elsewhere, whatever their title and whatever their activity, commits an act of slavery, slavery, also terrorist, and falls under the law and its consequences.

32) - Whoever executes an order coming from his authority, an order relating to slavery, which ignores people and peoples, is also guilty of his leader(s) and both fall under the law and must suffer the same fate.

33) - It is clear that, according to the Alaw¼nbadr Dam of His Eternal Majesty Emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines, no power has authority, of any nature whatsoever, over another power, that is to say over people and the organizational structure that they give themselves. The law will apply in all its rigor.

34) - No institution, whatever its nature, can accommodate, under any pretext, the member of another power removed, at best, kidnapped by the authority under which it is placed. Otherwise, she participates in the crime in the same way as the other, the visible kidnapper, and instantly falls foul of the law and its consequences for slavery, kidnapping and terrorism.

35) - Any person such as any head of state or government as well as a representative targeting the authority of another state and assassinating it, in other words, taking its life, in public, in full view of everyone, are guilty of Siamese terrorism and crime against Busa, they will be locked up for the rest of their lives.

36) - Even if such an act, the assassination of a leader by that of another power, takes place in secret, for example, the use of drones, the problem is the same. The second this becomes known, steps in this direction begin to apprehend the criminal in order to inflict on him what he or she deserves.

37) - Any other person such as any other head of state or government as well as any other representative who applauds the assassination in question fully subscribes to it and is equally guilty of it, then will suffer the same fate. It is this certain support which leads to the effectiveness of the crime.

38) - Not to mention, oh no! other young girls and boys from other conflicts, it is imperative that the primary school for girls, aged six to twelve, in Iran, where nearly two hundred who were murdered, with premeditation, on February 28, 2026, will necessarily, as a sufficient obligation because it is the law, be the subject of a particular “judicial” prosecution to impose respect on the slavers and murderers who proudly act as masters and mistresses of Life. This concerns planet earth. This provocative assassination is committed in good conscience but it cannot go unpunished. This is the business of all People-States. Those responsible as well as the supporters, people without whom there would be no crimes possible, will be locked up until the end of their days. It’s vindictiveness. It is up to the People, the community of People-States, to take care of this.

39) - There are people calling themselves Iranian who jumped for joy when they heard the news of the murder of girls at their school. In particular, we break all links between Iran and these unspeakable monsters and, at the same time, accuse them of mass murder of defenseless young girls for the benefit of slavery. They are also guilty of crime against Busa. Their sentence is, therefore, confinement until the end of their days. We cannot remain passive in the face of this monstrous act which is, in a particular way, a declaration of war against lakort Munal. This would be turning our back on Life in favor of savqnie or savqnerie, savagery in system, therefore monstrosity, to use the vocabulary of His Majesty the Eternal Emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines.

40) - Let the people stand up and form the Community or Solidarity of People-States for the salvation of planet earth, their immediate good and a bright future otherwise.

41) - Whoever wants to join another power, by the mere enunciation, the fact of saying it, of his new choice, already enjoys the full protection of the chosen power and, by the same token, his life begins here, in the power of his choice.

42) - Any mun genetically rooted in a power but, for one reason or another, does not live there, can come and live there quite simply and he automatically accesses everything that is reserved for other Badr. It is enough for him to accept, in word and deed, the structure of power, in other words, not to bring with him or with it the morals of where he arrives.

43) - No purchase (the same applies to any sale) made by the citizen, from one power to another power is definitive. It can be canceled at any time as needed.

44) - We take up here, not without reason, a consequence of the Alaw¼badr Dam by Jean Jacques Dessalines to help certain people to understand or absorb what is stated there. No nation is concerned with the internal affairs, what happens inside, of another and it cannot instigate anything. Opinion from the outside, in whatever form, has no effect. Simply saying something, in private or in public, is a crime and the consequences of violating the law will follow. In other words, failure to respect the lives of others immediately leads to recourse to the law against slavery and its consequences.

45) - No people, under any pretext, can, of their own accord, go to war against another, which does not mean that this is done only under the authority of any international organization because no people of the Community of People-States is a member of any international organization, whatever it may be.

46) - Any people of the Community of People-States who are attacked by the peoples in the wrong direction, the rogue peoples, in particular the whiteists, can automatically benefit from the assistance of the other People-States of the Community, if this is their will, without neglecting the prosecution before the courts for slavery.

47) - People who go against the grain are our natural enemies. They have nothing good to offer. It is not voluntary. It is because of their objective, which arises from their project, which is to crush the number of people or nations that they can in order to be able to approach the pragmatic man. This is fixed by their human substance, their conception of themselves, of which the natural law of man, a horror, is the form.

48) - It is imperative that the people, through enlightened people, those who understand, even a little, what is at stake, here and now, immediately begin the coalition process, in one way or another. This is the responsibility of everyone, regardless of their status. As everyone sets to work, here and now, there is no time left. Support each other in the event of aggression!

49) - The people and people of Venezuela urgently need your assistance, here and now.

50) - It is not a question here of complexion but of the Divine Life that we are.

51) - The above is the legal basis for the Order of Peoples against the current state of affairs on the planet. Everyone has the sufficient obligation to undertake, themselves, here and now, all the necessary steps to achieve, in the very near future, the effectiveness of the Order of Peoples for the good of all, wherever they are. It is to firmly, with all one’s strength, and irrevocably reject the path to disappearance. We have, from Our God, inherited life, His Life, something immeasurable, we must unconditionally take jealous care of it. It is therefore imperative, by the unprecedented weight of the Thing and the Divine Order of Things, which understands us fully and infinitely, to maintain forever within Us the Verticality of our Munal Being by bending before it.

.52) - ..., etc., etc., etc.

May the people immediately take charge by forming themselves into a State following the model of His Majesty the Eternal Emperor Jean Jacques Dessalines in order to be in perfect harmony with themselves and forever avoid the path of disappearance! It is obvious that it is against them that the current system of government was set up. It aims to immobilize them in the interest of a few and it is on track to succeed. The proof is that only one powerful person among them allows himself to speak openly about putting his hands on people and what they possess, then take action in complete peace without anyone saying a single word. It looks like the planet is a desert or a cemetery. Being is not in oneself but in someone other than oneself. People are being crushed by all means, including severe economic sanctions and bombs, even old people, small children and babies are spared, despite the murderers. They murder in public, openly, and to a round of applause. The murderers are respectable and respected men, men of great value, men honored in every way, model men. We give and bear death in the public square and present ourselves as noble and as the only model. What is this planet?

The Decree is in force as of today, Sunday March 1, 2026.

For the Imperial House of Dessalines, the Empire of Ayti, Eternal Empire of Tóya-Dessalines, Empire of Gwqmuniality, which the enemy and his gang, present on Our Imperial Territory, wrongly believed to have swallowed up forever:

HRH His Majesty Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines D'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste, 7th of the Generation of the Imperial Couple, Marie Claire Heureuse Félicité Bonheur and Jean-Jacques Dessalines, 3rd of the line of Emperors of AYITI, and Guarantor of the w¼nity of lakort, the order of Us, and the Empire Tóya-Dessalines, Specialist and professor of the science of politics, theorist of politics, particularly of whiteness, and theorist of munality, i.e. VudUn Existentialism.

Rechercher dans ce blog

Forum-Impératrice Claire Heureuse Dessalines, la Ville de Dessalines, Capitale Impériale d'Ayti

The order of peoples, regardless of skin color or culture, to counter slavery in every way! The annihilation of peoples, through the annihilation of individuals, is underway—this is the reality revealed in broad daylight!

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Sa Majesté Le Prince Weber Tiécoura Dessalines D'Orléans Charles Jean Baptiste

Décret 1806 – 2019 – 7 - 6 la création des CQ pour la fin de la pauvreté est effective

LE MESSAGE DU MERCREDI 17 OCTOBRE 2018, LA RÉPUBLIQUE UNE COLONIE AU PAYS DE DESSALINES,